Criminal defense, drunk driving, military law - Orange County California
Orange County Criminal Defense Lawyer You Need To Know About Your Criminal Case About Criminal Charges You Are Facing Past Case Results - Testimonials Criminal Law Resources Contact Will Bruzzo - Criminal Defense Attorney
Bruzzo attorney at law - former major USMCR
 
BBB - Accredited Business

Will Bruzzo's Blog

Criminal Defense | Drunk Driving | Military Law

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Former Westminster Sergeant Guilty Of Domestic Violence

William Arganda, former Westminster police sergeant in Orange County, California, an 18 year veteran with the force, was sentenced to three years informal probation, 100 hours community service and five days of service at the California Department of Transportation. Arganda pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of domestic violence and unlawful disclosure of DMV records. He was accused of using the CLETS system (which connects to DMV, state and federal law-enforcement databases) for personal rather than professional reasons. Arganda was said to have used the databases to meet women, look up names and license plates, and keep an eye on his ex-wife and ex-girlfriends. He was eventually fired from the department for doing so. Domestic Violence can be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor under Penal Code Sections 273.5 and 243(e) (1);as misdemeanors both charges carry a maximum punishment of 1 year in the county jail. As felonies both charges carry a maximum of 3 years in state prison. In addition, if a Defendant is found guilty of these charges or pleads guilty he/she must complete a 52-week batterer's course, 8 hours of community service and pay about $800.00 in fines, fees and "donations". A skillful attorney can help you avoid a conviction under this code section and/or custody time depending on your individual facts.

Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Reckless Motorcyclist Cause Death

On April 25 2009 two motorcyclists were on the 241 Toll Road in Orange County going over 100 mph after midnight. One of the motorcyclists Blaise Aaron Meadows crashed into an Alpha Romeo, the driver Andrew Parker later died due to blunt force trauma. Meadows was taken to the hospital while the other motorcyclist Daniel Cody Burkett left the scene. Meadows pled guilty to one felony count of vehicular manslaughter (Penal Code Section 192) and will be sentenced on July 30, 2010. Burkett will be arraigned on February 16 and is being charged with one count vehicular manslaughter by unlawful act, gross negligence (Penal Code Section 192), one misdemeanor count of reckless driving (Vehicle Code Section 23103) and a sentencing enhancement for fleeing the scene of a crime. The sentencing enhancement adds more time to his prison term but is not considered a charge. The gross negligence specification to the vehicular manslaughter charge could be for driving over 100mph.

Criminal Law Updates by Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Assault on a Peace Officer Charge Dismissed


A Battery occurs whenever one person touches another without consent. A Battery can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. The amount of injury to the victim will usually decide whether the case is charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. Here is one client's experience facing a battery charge in Orange County:

"I was charged with Assault on a Peace Officer (Penal Code Section 241(b)); Battery on an Officer(Penal Code Section 243(b))and Resisting Arrest (Penal Code Section 148(a) (1)). These charges occurred as a result of an altercation I got into with a Police Officer in Orange County. I was looking at up to one year in jail for these offenses. I hired William W. Bruzzo to represent me because of his reputation and his familiarity with the courts in Orange County. I told Mr. Bruzzo that not only did I not assault the officer in question but that he assaulted me without reason or provocation. I realized that for the most part it would be my word against the officer's. Mr. Bruzzo took my case and began investigating the officer by filing motions which requested the personnel records of the officer in question. The County of Orange fought to keep the records from being revealed but Mr. Bruzzo won in the end. The personnel records of the officer in question revealed that he had had problems with violence in the past. Mr. Bruzzo used this information in his negotiations with the District Attorney. In the end, the District Attorney agreed to DISMISS all the charges against me! I am very grateful to Mr. Bruzzo for his work and I would enthusiastically recommend him for any criminal matter." ~ WR, 01/15/2010

Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Woman Flees From Police In Orange County

A woman evaded the police in Huntington Beach, Orange County on January 13, 2010 after being pulled over around 12:30 a.m. Police suspected she was on drugs and were discussing the situation, when the woman suddenly fled in her vehicle and headed south on Pacific Coast highway. The woman led the police on a chase from Huntington Beach to Laguna Beach, where she eventually crashed into a guardrail after running over spike strips police had laid out. The woman did not suffer any injuries and was taken to jail on possible charges of Vehicle Code Section 2800.1. The code section specifies that "any person who, while operating a motor vehicle and with the intent to evade, willfully flees or otherwise attempts to elude a pursuing peace officer's motor vehicle, is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year if all of the following conditions exist: (1) The peace officer's motor vehicle is exhibiting at least one lighted red lamp visible from the front and the person either sees or reasonably should have seen the lamp. (2) The peace officer's motor vehicle is sounding a siren as may be reasonably necessary. (3) The peace officer's motor vehicle is distinctively marked. (4) The peace officer's motor vehicle is operated by a peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, and that peace officer is wearing a distinctive uniform." Notably, this crime can also be a felony under vehicle code section 2800.2 if in addition to fleeing the police the individual drives with a wanton, willful disregard for the safety of persons or property. That crime can carry a maximum of three years even without causing any injury or property damage.

Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 14, 2010

High School Teacher Charged with Sex Crimes

On January 6, 2010 in Orange County, Christopher Ontiveros, a history teacher at Oxford Academy, pleaded not guilty to charges of sexual acts with a 17-year-old student in his class. Several explicit text messages have been discovered, implicating Mr. Ontiveros.

The history teacher started out by tutoring the young female student after school and then later counseling her on medical issues, and eventually, spent time with her outside of school. The student told police that Mr. Ontiveros kissed her once at the end of the last school year and once school resumed in September, the relationship grew more intimate. In one of his numerous texts, he wrote, "Maybe there's many ways to prove myself, but one for sure is when I get to hold u and share this ecstatic love making, it's real and binds us."

The Orange County District Attorney has charged Mr. Ontiveros with three felony counts of sexual penetration by foreign object of a minor (California Penal Code Section 289), one felony count of oral copulation of a minor (California Penal Code Section 288a), one felony count of distributing harmful sexual material to a minor, one felony count of contacting a child with intent to commit sexual penetration, and one misdemeanor count of sexual battery. If convicted, Mr. Ontiveros faces a maximum sentence of six years in state prison.

Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636


This video, OC in Two, is produced by the Orange County Register and includes information about this case.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Bubba, Award Winning Bulldog Stolen!

Bubba, an award-winning bulldog, was stolen last week on December 15th in Santa Ana, Orange County. The owners are offering a $2,000 reward for anyone who can return their prized possession.

California Penal Code Section 487e states: "Every person who feloniously steals, takes, or carries away a dog of another which is of a value exceeding four hundred dollars ($400) is guilty of grand theft." Bubba recently won second place in the Eukanuba dog show in Long Beach; he has been micro chipped and is worth more than $10,000. "I bring him out every day to work because he is kind of like my little kid," the owner said. "He's not only a show dog, but he's like my little baby." Grand theft is punishable under Penal Code Section 489 by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison.

In Bubba's case, an employee accidentally left a door open and the bulldog wandered out of the building. Witnesses told the owner that two men about 20 years old cut across three lanes of traffic in their car to lure the dog inside. The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo represent individuals accused of all crimes to include grand theft, Penal Code Section 487(a).

This news video courtesy of KABC-TV Los Angeles:


Criminal Law Updates by William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Possession of a Controlled Substance



Notably, while these charges usually concern "street drugs" like Cocaine and Methamphetamine they can also apply to substances commonly thought of as medications.

If you are found in actual possession of the drug or "constructive" possession of the drug you may be found guilty of the offense. Constructive possession means that the drug may not be on your person but you knowingly exercise control over or the right to control the drug, either directly or through another person or persons. In order for the prosecution to prove its case they must show that the person knew the substance was a controlled substance and that there was enough of the drug to constitute a usable amount.

In California this offense is a felony and you may face up to three years in prison. Here is a recent case result:

"I was charged with Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a)(Possession of a controlled substance HS 11377(a)a felony which carries a maximum of 3 years in prison. I had previous convictions for the same charge and I had similar charges pending. I was also charged with driving on a suspended license (Vehicle Code Section 14601.1 - VC 14601.1) and possession of paraphernalia (Health and Safety Code Section 11364 - HS 11364(a)) as misdemeanors. I hired Mr. William Bruzzo because he was recommended by another attorney and because of his familiarity with the Orange County courts and the District Attorney. The original offer prior to hiring Mr. Bruzzo was 180 days in jail and pleading guilty to a felony. Mr. Bruzzo convinced the District Attorney there was not a useable amount of the controlled substance and that my driving on a suspended license was justifiable by Necessity, even though I had priors [convictions] for [that charge] too. Mr. Bruzzo got the possession charge DISMISSED [Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a) - HS 11377(a)]and the Vehicle Code Section 14601.1 [Driving on a suspended license - VC 14601.1] DISMISSED. I pleaded guilty to one count of possession of paraphernalia as a misdemeanor [Health and Safety Code Section 11364(a) - HS 11364] and I got CAL TRANS [instead of jail]. I would enthusiastically recommend Mr. Bruzzo for any possession of a controlled substance case or any criminal matter." ~~ CK, December 9, 2009

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Arson Investigation Orange Public Library


The week prior to Thanksgiving someone apparently intentionally set a fire in the men's restroom of the Orange Public Library. Fortunately, no one was hurt, but the building was evacuated and the restroom sustained some minimal damage. The fire is under investigation.

California Penal Code Section 451 states, "A person is guilty of arson when he or she willfully and maliciously sets fire to or burns or causes to be burned or who aids, counsels, or procures the burning of, any structure, forest land, or property."

So, to prove that someone is guilty of the crime of arson, the State must prove that (1) The defendant damaged or destroyed with fire all or part of something; And (2) The defendant acted on purpose intending to defraud, annoy, or injure someone else.

Arson includes burning someone's clothing or trash not belonging to anyone. The punishment for arson varies depending on what damage results from the fire. The crime can be charged as a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for five, seven, or nine years if great bodily injury results. Arson of property (not one's own) is a felony punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, two, or three years.

Criminal Law Updates by Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, November 20, 2009

Polston Pled Guily to Grand Theft at Boys & Girls Clubs Tustin CA

Boys and Girls Clubs
The head of the Boys & Girls Clubs of Tustin, California in Orange County, Clifford Polston, pled guilty to grand theft for stealing more than $114,000 from the group. The Boys & Girls Club of Tustin, which provides a safe place for youth to learn and grow, was shocked over the recent turn of events.

Polston took $6,323 in unauthorized car allowance and paid $75,000 to his wife for a fictitious job that he created. Now, as punishment for his crime, he has to repay $137,000 to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Tustin plus ten percent interest using proceeds from a life insurance policy purchased for him by the Club. Former mayor Tracy Worley Hagen said she feels "terrible" because she thought "he was doing a great job for the community", but she is "happy he's going to try to make it right with the Boys & Girls Club."

Grand theft, what Polston pled guilty to, differs from petty theft in that the value of the property stolen exceeds $400. Here, Polston stole well above that amount and received an enhanced sentence because of it. Typically, felony grand theft, defined by Penal Code Section 487, carries a maximum sentence of three years State Prison. However, in Polston's case, he was looking at a maximum of four years State Prison.

Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Home Confinement Versus Prison for a Hit and Run Violation

Success vs Failure, Home Confinement vs Prison
Every hit and run case will have a slightly different outcome for the accused. Seeking legal representation or not can mean the difference between home confinement versus prison for a hit and run violation. Today we bring you a new testimonial from our client accused of four felony counts and facing a five year prison sentence.

"I was charged with felony hit and run (Vehicle Code Section 20001(a)) and three additional counts of felony reckless driving (Vehicle Code 23105(a). [Maximum Prison time of 5 years] I was alleged to have driven in a reckless manner injuring my four passengers and then left the scene. The District Attorney initially wanted to send me to prison. I hired Attorney William Bruzzo to represent me in this matter as I know he is an excellent attorney who fights for his clients. Mr. Bruzzo fought very hard for me with the result that I got the felony hit and run (Vehicle Code Section 20001(a) DISMISSED; I pled guilty to one count of reckless driving (Vehicle Code Section 23105(a) and I was permitted to do my time on home confinement. This was a very good result and I am very grateful to Mr. Bruzzo. I would enthusiastically recommend him for any criminal matter." ~~ KA 11/13/2009

Labels: , , , , , ,

Monday, November 9, 2009

Teenager Receives 50 years to Life for Gang Shootings

16-year-old Marco Antonio Perez was sentenced on October 23, 2009, to a minimum of 50 years in state prison for a 2006 shooting that left two rival gang members dead and a third in a coma.

A jury in adult court found Perez guilty of two felony counts of special-circumstances murder for the benefit of a criminal street gang, one felony count of attempted murder and one felony count of street terrorism.

Perez was prosecuted as an adult for the execution-style shooting that took place in Santa Ana when he was 14 years old. Victims were ages 14, 15, and 16. Two other members of his gang have already been sentenced to multiple life sentences and the other three are awaiting trial.

Juveniles, or minors under the age of 18, can be prosecuted for any of the same crimes for which adults can be prosecuted. So, a child who is 14 years old can be tried in adult court for some serious crimes such as murder and attempted murder, setting fire to a building with people in it, robbery with a weapon, rape, kidnapping or carjacking, crimes with guns, drug crimes, and escaping from a juvenile detention facility without a hearing before a juvenile judge. Prop 21, which was passed in 2000, allows prosecution to direct file without a juvenile court judge making the determination as to whether the minor should remain in juvenile court or be transferred to adult criminal court. Only an experienced criminal defense attorney can then examine the possibility of transferring the minor from adult criminal court back to juvenile court for sentencing under the Reverse Remand Law, Penal Code Sections 1170.17 and 1170.19. The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo has represented many Defendants to include juveniles charged with gang offenses (Penal Code Section 186.22)

Criminal Law Updates by Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, November 2, 2009

Robbers Were Acting Like Cops

A man and a woman were arrested for committing a string of robberies in Santa Ana while impersonating police officers. Robbers were acting like cops. The individuals suspected are charged with robbing nearly $2,000 from five victims during four separate incidents in one month. Police are still looking for the third suspect.

During the robberies, one of the suspects was wearing a security-type uniform and carried a handgun. The other suspect wore all black clothing and a jacket that said SECURITY. Santa Ana Police Commander said, "The suspects' demeanor was that of police officers and the victims did not realize they were being robbed until the suspects fled with their money."

Robbery, a felony, may be punished by 3 to 6 years in State Prison. California Penal Code Section 211 defines robbery as the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear. Fear means fear of injury to oneself or the person's family or property or to someone in one's company. The value of the property taken does not matter.

An important element for robbery to be established is force or fear. Only an experienced criminal defense attorney can present a robbery defense by demonstrating that no force or fear was used to take the property or to prevent the victim from resisting. See also Penal Code Sections 211, 212.5 and 213; Criminal Law Updates from the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Understanding of the Domestic Violence California Penal Code

Domestic Violence occurs when one person physically strikes another person without consent and the two people are married, in a dating relationship or otherwise romantically involved. This crime can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony. If charged as a misdemeanor the maximum jail time possible is one-year. If charged as a felony the maximum jail time could be as much as 4-years. In these cases it is important that the accused have a basic understanding of the domestic violence California Penal Code Sections 243(e)(1) and 273.5).

Here is a testimonial from one of Mr. Bruzzo's clients:

"I was charged with Penal Code Section 273.5 [Domestic Violence]; a conviction of this crime could have caused me to spend up to 1 year in custody. I hired William W. Bruzzo to represent me in this matter because he is familiar with the Courts, the Judges and the District Attorneys in the County of Orange. My case was considered aggravated because two witnesses observed me punching the victim multiple times. Mr. Bruzzo told me that a conviction for a violent act such as this would have been detrimental to my record and therefore my future. He worked hard to get the charge changed. In the end he had the charge reduced to a Penal Code Section 415 [Disturbing the Peace]. The Domestic Violence Charge was dismissed. I truly believe that without Mr. Bruzzo's familiarity with the Orange County Courts and the law I would not have received such a good result. I would enthusiastically recommend him for any criminal matter." ~ NS 9/28/09

Labels: , , , , , , ,

 

 

 

Criminal Defense Site Guide
Criminal Defense Attorney | Orange County Web Site Design