|
DRUG POSSESSION CASES
TRANSPORTATION AND SALE OF HEROIN; POSSESSION FOR
SALE OF COCAINE (Health and Safety Code sections 11352 and
11351)
Client arrested for possession of 4 ounces of heroin and
charged with several counts including possession, sales and
transportation of heroin; also charged with possession for
sale of cocaine. All charges out of Orange County Superior
Court. Client facing maximum of 17 years in state prison. Attorney
William W. Bruzzo successfully negotiated with the
District Attorney to get client released into a drug program. CLIENT
WAS NOT SENTENCED TO JAIL FOR THIS CRIME. Meanwhile
the Client’s co-defendant who was not represented
by Mr. Bruzzo and did not even have the illegal drugs on
him, received 3 years in prison. Mr. Bruzzo’s familiarity
with the court and the District Attorney permitted the very
favorable outcome in this case.
(Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a)/ “STRIKE” CASE (Penal
Code Sections 667 and 1192.7)
Client facing time in state prison for possession of methamphetamine
(Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a). Such a charge can
usually be resolved with the client going to a program; however,
in this case, because the client had a prior strike conviction,
his sentence was doubled and he was looking at years in state
prison. Fortunately, it is possible for the District Attorney
and/or the Judge to remove the strike for the purposes of
sentencing so it does not effect the sentence. In this case Attorney
William W. Bruzzo was successful in convincing the
Judge by filing a formal motion to remove the strike! The
client was then given credit for time served in county jail
and released the same day! Mr. Bruzzo’s knowledge and
hard work made the difference in this case.
POSSESSION OF METHAMPHETAMINE (Health
and Safety Code Section 11377(a))
Client was accused of misdemeanor unauthorized possession
of a syringe which contained methamphetamine. Because of
prior convictions that sent the client to state prison he
was ineligible for drug programs and was looking at 90 days
in jail. Attorney William W. Bruzzo filed
a MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE because he felt the search
which led the police to finding to finding the syringe was
illegal. On the day the motion was to be heard the District
Attorney examined the motion presented by Mr. Bruzzo and
decided to DISMISS the case after the client paid $50.00
in costs WITHOUT EVEN GOING TO A HEARING.
Without Mr. Bruzzo’s advice and guidance the client
would have been incarcerated and placed on three years of
probation.
(Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a)
The client pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance
(Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a)); the client had
a drug relapse and was terminated from the Penal Code Section
1000 (PC 1000) program for the second time. This case was
out of the Orange County Superior Court. The Judge was going
to sentence the client to 90 days in jail. Mr. Bruzzo appeared
in court the same day he was hired and asked for two days
to permit investigation of the case. Mr. Bruzzo subpoenaed
the drug program director and in so doing was able to disprove
the first program termination and got the client released
the very same day. Mr. Bruzzo’s quick and aggressive
representation kept the client out of jail.
(Health and Safety Code Section 11378)
Client charged with felony possession of a controlled substance
for sale (Health and Safety Code Section 11378) that included
a sentence enhancement for possession of a weapon out of
Orange County Superior Court; in addition client was charged
with misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance. The
client then failed to appear on either case, as a result
a WARRANT was issued for the Client’s
arrest. Seven years later the client was arrested on the
warrant and faced up to 6 years in prison. By this time the
client was married with children. Mr. Bruzzo made several
appearances and in the end was able to negotiate a deal whereby
the client was able to do his time on HOME CONFINEMENT; in
addition Mr. Bruzzo managed to get the misdemeanor case DISMISSED.
Mr. Bruzzo’s familiarity with the District Attorneys
and the Judge made all the difference in the favorable outcome
in this case.
POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE
AND POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE WITH INTENT TO SELL
(Health and Safety Code Sections 11377(a) and 11378)
The Client was charged with Possession of a controlled substance
and possession of a controlled substance for sale (Health
and Safety Code Sections 11377(a) and 11378) out of Orange
County Superior Court; specifically the client had over 200
Ecstasy pills and confessed to the crime. Attorney
William W. Bruzzo began negotiating with the District
Attorney and used his familiarity with the District Attorney
to negotiate a deal so that the client DID NOT SPEND ONE
DAY IN JAIL. In addition, Mr. Bruzzo negotiated the case
so that after successful completion of probation the possession
with intent to sell charge would be DISMISSED
DISCLAIMER
The case results described in this website
are not intended nor do they constitute a guarantee, warranty
or prediction regarding the outcome of your case. Every case
is different and many factors come into play such as the particular
facts of the case and background of the client. The information
on this site should not be interpreted as offering formal legal
advice or construed as forming an attorney-client relationship.
This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters
outside of the state of California.
The case results described in this website have been initialed
or signed by the actual client and are available for review
by officials of the California State Bar.
Drug Possesion Charges
Criminal Defense Site Guide | Drug Case Results Criminal Defense Web Site Development by Webconsuls, LLC
|