<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[municipal-codes - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/municipal-codes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/municipal-codes/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:45:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[City of Anaheim Revokes Parking Citations]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/city-of-anaheim-revokes-parking-citations/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/city-of-anaheim-revokes-parking-citations/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[anaheim]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[municipal-codes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[parking-citations]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[public-works-department]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent graduation ceremony at Anaheim High School brought frustration for many individuals, as they were issued $51.00 parking citations. The cars, which were parked in a city alley adjacent to the school’s auditorium, violated the Municipal Code which prohibits parking in “any” alley. Sgt. Martinez said that because “alleyways are narrow, parked cars inhibit&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="250" height="250" src="/static/2022/11/parking-sign.png" alt="Parking sign" class="wp-image-1121" srcset="/static/2022/11/parking-sign.png 250w, /static/2022/11/parking-sign-150x150.png 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></figure></div>


<p>A recent graduation ceremony at Anaheim High School brought frustration for many individuals, as they were issued $51.00 parking citations. The cars, which were parked in a city alley adjacent to the school’s auditorium, violated the Municipal Code which prohibits parking in “any” alley. Sgt. Martinez said that because “alleyways are narrow, parked cars inhibit access to homes and business and could block access by fire trucks.”</p>



<p>However, teachers and parents who received these citations on June 16, 2010 complained how there were no “No Parking” signs and a recently added curb was not painted red. The city has now revoked more than a dozen of these tickets. Officials agreed that the recent addition of an unpainted curb through the school’s beautification project may have made the street look more like a city street instead of an alley. The Public works Department will now be painting the curb red in just a matter of days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Don’t Forget Your Sunscreen]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dont-forget-your-sunscreen/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dont-forget-your-sunscreen/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-court-appeal]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[incarceration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[municipal-codes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[nudists]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[nudity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[nudity-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[pro-nude-beach-groups]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[san-onofre]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>As the beach weather returns sun bathers at San Onofre State Beach will be facing enforcement against nudists. There is a disagreement on whether the beach should allow nudity. The California Court of Appeal decided that the Cahil Policy was not a valid measure because it had not been passed through proper procedures for approval.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>As the beach weather returns sun bathers at San Onofre State Beach will be facing enforcement against nudists. There is a disagreement on whether the beach should allow nudity. The California Court of Appeal decided that the Cahil Policy was not a valid measure because it had not been passed through proper procedures for approval. That policy meant that nudity was allowed unless there was a citizen complaint to authorities who could then cite the nudist. There are those that argue that the policy is valid and officials should not be able to cite beach goers without swim wear. Over the weekend there were two people cited for nudity at the beach. It was estimated that the ticket, including fees would be roughly $500. State park officials explain that they have been informing the public they will start issuing citations and that the public has had ample warning of the new policies. The pro nude beach groups intend to work on keeping San Onofre clothing optional. A person found in violation of the nudity law could be cited under various municipal code sections and subject to incarceration and/or fines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>