<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Parole - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/parole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/parole/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 13:57:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Governor Gives Reprieve to Juvenile Offenders Serving Life Sentences]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/governor-gives-reprieve-to-juvenile-offenders-serving-life-sentences/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/governor-gives-reprieve-to-juvenile-offenders-serving-life-sentences/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California-Law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Imprisonment]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Minors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prisons]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SB260]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Just before the end of California’s last legislative session, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that would allow the possibility of&nbsp;parole for minors tried as adults.&nbsp;According to the&nbsp;LA Times, about 6,000 inmates could go before a parole board. Their sentences could be reduced and they could be placed on parole after serving 15 years of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="375" src="/static/2022/11/300px-JerryBrownByPhilKonstantin.jpeg" alt="Photo of Jerry Brown" class="wp-image-815" srcset="/static/2022/11/300px-JerryBrownByPhilKonstantin.jpeg 300w, /static/2022/11/300px-JerryBrownByPhilKonstantin-240x300.jpeg 240w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /><figcaption>English: Photo of California Attorney General (and former California Governor) Jerry Brown (Photo credit: <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JerryBrownByPhilKonstantin.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wikipedia</a>)</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>Just before the end of California’s last legislative session, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that would allow the possibility of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/juvenile-law.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">parole for minors tried as adults.</a>&nbsp;According to the&nbsp;<em><strong>LA Times</strong></em>, about 6,000 inmates could go before a parole board. Their sentences could be reduced and they could be placed on parole after serving 15 years of their sentence. This means that an inmate sentenced in his mid teens would get out in his early thirties. Many were sentenced to life without parole for various types of charges including violent crimes or being an accomplice. One group lobbied for bill SB260 in order to change the approach the system takes on inmate youth.</p>



<p>Governor Brown referenced the signed bill in his request for an extension of time to reduce the states prison population. He explained that this bill would decrease the amount of inmates in state prisons. A federal panel of judges has given California until December 31, 2013 to reduce the numbers by around 8,000 inmates according to&nbsp;<em><strong>Reuters</strong></em>. Some legislators and groups would like to see the state fund rehabilitation programs in order to reduce the prison population. Families of victims have a different perspective on the issue and some believe that whether they were minors or not at the time of commission of the offense, they should serve their entire sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Cops Get a New “App”]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/cops-get-a-new-app/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/cops-get-a-new-app/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[computer app]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[judicial-data-system]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Probation]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday, September 9, 2013, that California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a computer application “app” for law enforcement. This app would be used on cell phones and tablets. The purpose would be to get an individual suspects information from state and federal databases. From the databases police officers would&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday, September 9, 2013, that California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a computer application “app” for law enforcement. This app would be used on cell phones and tablets. The purpose would be to get an individual suspects information from state and federal databases. From the databases police officers would know if the person is on parole or probation from their hand held device, not by returning to their patrol car or the police station. It saves time and gives them more information at an instant. San Francisco tested this app with 600 officers, and noticed improvement in their performance. The Los Angeles Police Department will try the app later on in the year. Security steps to access the app vary, including encryption, passwords and disabling copying or screen saves.</p>



<p><em><strong>CBS Los Angeles</strong></em> reports on the new “app.”</p>



<p>If you are having trouble viewing the video, you can <a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=9292084" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">see it here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Appeals Court Overrides Governor’s Decision]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-appeals-court-overrides-governors-decision/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-appeals-court-overrides-governors-decision/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Anthony-Perez]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[second-degree-murder]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>After twenty four years behind bars for second degree murder Anthony Perez was granted parole by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Orange County. His original review by the Board of Parole Hearings in November 2008 granted him parole but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger blocked his release in 2009. The governor believed that Perez was&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>After twenty four years behind bars for second degree murder Anthony Perez was granted parole by the 4th District Court of Appeal in Orange County. His original review by the Board of Parole Hearings in November 2008 granted him parole but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger blocked his release in 2009. The governor believed that Perez was still a danger because of his disregard for life shown at the time of the crime. The decision was appealed to the Orange County Superior Court which upheld the governor’s decision prompting Perez to appeal to the 4th District Court of Appeal. When Perez was 19 years-old he took part in a physical altercation that resulted in the death of an individual. Perez and other gang members beat a man who had a cousin in a rival gang. Perez hit the victim with a wooden board as he attempted to flee. During his time in prison Perez earned college credits, mainly stayed out of trouble and participated in Alcoholics Anonymous. The District Attorney opposed the appeal according to the Orange County register.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Early Release of Prisoners]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/early-release-of-prisoners/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/early-release-of-prisoners/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 03:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[correction-officials]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[early-release]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[early-release-program]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal-prison]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>State correction officials say that 7 out of 10 parolees in California end up back in prison within three years of their release. People are then left to wonder just what impact the early release of prisoners will have on their community. Officials are aiming to reduce the prison population by 6,500 inmates by the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="320" height="256" src="/static/2022/11/prison-realease.jpg" alt="Prison release" class="wp-image-1213" srcset="/static/2022/11/prison-realease.jpg 320w, /static/2022/11/prison-realease-300x240.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px" /></figure></div>


<p>State correction officials say that 7 out of 10 parolees in California end up back in prison within three years of their release. People are then left to wonder just what impact the <a href="///Users/griselda/Downloads/blog.bruzzolaw.com/2010/01/early-release-for-california-prisoners.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">early release of prisoners</a> will have on their community. Officials are aiming to reduce the prison population by 6,500 inmates by the end of this year through an early-release program which allows prisoners to reduce their time through work and good-behavior credits. For Orange County, this means over 300 state prison inmates will likely be released and return to their hometown of Orange County.<br><br>The early-release program is one of the measures adopted by state legislators to help reduce the budget deficit. However, <a href="///Users/griselda/Downloads/blog.bruzzolaw.com/2010/02/orange-county-deputies-lawsuit-stop.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">law enforcement officials</a> are worried that in this tough economy of few jobs and rehabilitative programs, there will be little options available for the inmates who are released. New state guidelines are also changing the way prisoners will be monitored after their release—it will go from supervised to unsupervised parole.<br><br>The new parole system will allow resources to go where most needed, that is, to the most violent parolees who are also the most likely to commit new crimes. The early releases and changes to the parole system are expected to save the state around half a billion dollars in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Shocking Interrogation Video of Two Teenage Killers]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/shocking-interrogation-video-of-two-teenage-killers/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/shocking-interrogation-video-of-two-teenage-killers/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[calvin-pearson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Criminal-Defense-Attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[daniel-russell]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marie-oliver]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[william-bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>An interrogation video of two teenage killers was recently released in Sacramento. 16-year-old Daniel Russell and 16-year-old Calvin Pearson broke into the home of Marie Oliver, a 90-year-old woman, and beat her to death using her cane. After breaking her nose, cheekbone, eye socket, and two of her ribs, they took off with some of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>An interrogation video of two teenage killers was recently released in Sacramento. 16-year-old Daniel Russell and 16-year-old Calvin Pearson broke into the home of Marie Oliver, a 90-year-old woman, and beat her to death using her cane. After breaking her nose, cheekbone, eye socket, and two of her ribs, they took off with some of her valuables from her North Sacramento home.<br><br>A shocking interrogation video of the two minors (see video link below) just three days after the killing shows them sharing a pizza and some Sprite while discussing how they attacked the woman back in April 2006. In the video, the teens laugh about the killing and say how they should have “been more careful.” They question one another about whether the other snitched and show no remorse for their actions. They even go on to guess how much time they would get for the crime and one says: “Man, we’re doin’ at least a year, knock on wood we don’t.”<br><br>Unfortunately, the teens were way off in their speculations. The boys, who are now 18 and 19, were charged as adults for first-degree murder that carried special circumstance allegations of robbery and burglary and each received life in prison with no chance of parole.<br><br>Murder is defined by California Penal Code Section 187 as the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. CalCrim Jury Instruction 521 defines first degree murder as one that is “willful, deliberate, and premeditated.” In this case, the Prosecutor was able to show that the two boys <em>intended</em> to kill Ms. Oliver, carefully <em>weighted</em> the considerations and <em>knowing</em> the consequences, <em>decided</em> to kill her before actually doing so. Section 190 of the Penal Code states that, “Every person guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished by death, imprisonment in the state prison for life without the possibility of parole, or imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 25 years to life.” However, a serious charge such as this may be brought down to second degree murder or even manslaughter with the aid of an experienced criminal defense attorney.<br><br><a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">You can view the CBS Affilate KOVR’s Video here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Parole System Failure Despite Visits by Parole to Their Homes]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/parole-system-failure-despite-visits-by-parole-to-their-homes/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/parole-system-failure-despite-visits-by-parole-to-their-homes/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[anthony-sowell]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[parole-officers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[phillip-garrido]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sex-offenders]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[william-bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The stories of Anthony Sowell (multiple bodies found in his home) and Phillip Garrido (kidnap victim living in his home since 1990s) have touched on the issue of monitoring registered sex offenders. Regular visits by parole to their homes did not lead to any discoveries that things were wrong. Garrido’s officers would conduct searches of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The stories of Anthony Sowell (multiple bodies found in his home) and Phillip Garrido (kidnap victim living in his home since 1990s) have touched on the issue of monitoring registered sex offenders. Regular visits by parole to their homes did not lead to any discoveries that things were wrong. Garrido’s officers would conduct searches of his home on surprise visits. In Ohio, Sowell’s terms were to check in with parole and agents would show up to his residence to confirm he was still there but his terms did not include routine searches of his house. Questions now arise as to why all went unnoticed to officials in each case. There was an investigation into Garrido’s parole officers in order to determine if agents missed signs of irregularities and whether incorrect training was also an issue. Whether these cases will motivate a reform effort on how sex offenders are monitored after incarceration is yet to be seen. Conducting a more in depth monitoring of sex offenders would require more time and man power and that of course means more money then states at this point might not have. If it is determined agents need to be retrained or the monitoring system updated with new rules to implemented, the next issue becomes getting the funds necessary to make the changes in an already cash strapped system.<br><br>Here Harry Smith of CBS News reports on this issue:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="CA Officials on Phillip Garrido Case" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cm5gAQnVxXI?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>