<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Racketeering - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/racketeering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/racketeering/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:45:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Mexican Mafia Operating in Orange County]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/mexican-mafia-operating-in-orange-county/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/mexican-mafia-operating-in-orange-county/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drug-Deals]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Extortion]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gang-Activity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gangs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Mexican-Mafia]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Racketeering]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In a combined effort with three agencies, several alleged members of the Mexican Mafia and other gangs were arrested and charged in September of 2013 in Orange County according to the&nbsp;Los Angeles Times. A two and a half year long investigation by FBI agents, Orange County Sheriff’s detectives, Santa Ana police department and the Orange&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In a combined effort with three agencies, several alleged members of the Mexican Mafia and other gangs were arrested and charged in September of 2013 in Orange County according to the&nbsp;<em><strong>Los Angeles Times</strong></em>.</p>



<p>A two and a half year long investigation by FBI agents, Orange County Sheriff’s detectives, Santa Ana police department and the Orange County district attorney’s office resulted in federal and state indictments of 129 people.</p>



<p>There were 55 arrests along with seizures of weapons and drugs. The charges were for extortion, racketeering, and drug dealing. Officials released some details regarding the type of criminal activities the gang members were supposedly involved in. Some were said to have been dealing drugs in the jail or involved in beatings of gang member inmates.</p>



<p>The district attorney’s offices explained that these crimes were ordered by the Mexican Mafia. In the streets of Orange County, the Mexican Mafia ordered gangs to be taxed in order to operate in neighborhoods. The investigation, called&nbsp;<em>Operation Smokin’ Aces</em>, uncovered communications dealings with&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/possession-for-sale.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">heroin trafficking</a>&nbsp;and orders for beatings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Corrupt Judge Incarcerated Juveniles for Profit]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/corrupt-judge-incarcerated-juveniles-for-profit/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/corrupt-judge-incarcerated-juveniles-for-profit/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[conspiracy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[corrupt-judge]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Michael-Ciavarella]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[money-laundering]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Racketeering]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In Pennsylvania a juvenile court judge was convicted of racketeering, money laundering and conspiracy for a total of 12 counts. The crime involved receiving money from a detention center in exchange for sentencing juveniles to that particular facility. The judge, Michael Ciavarella allegedly worked to close the county juvenile facility then use a new private&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In Pennsylvania a juvenile court judge was convicted of racketeering, money laundering and conspiracy for a total of 12 counts. The crime involved receiving money from a detention center in exchange for sentencing juveniles to that particular facility. The judge, Michael Ciavarella allegedly worked to close the county juvenile facility then use a new private center that he and others were going to approve for construction. According to an article, people had complained about the judge’s often harsh punishment for minor offenses. Ciavarella sent 25% of defendants to juvenile detention in comparison to the state norm of 10%. There were also concerns that the judge denied defendants’ legal counsel when entering a plea. This corruption has created a situation where a large group of juvenile offenders might be in custody unreasonably and their cases might need a second look. As county employees, the judges enjoy immunity from civil prosecution for their work on the bench. It would make it difficult for parents for example, to sue for compensation. It is unclear how much the Judge received from the detention facility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>