<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[robbery - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/robbery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/robbery/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:45:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Robbers Were Acting Like Cops]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/robbers-were-acting-like-cops/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/robbers-were-acting-like-cops/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2019 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Felony]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police-officers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbers]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Santa-Ana]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A man and a woman were arrested for committing a string of robberies in Santa Ana while impersonating police officers. Robbers were acting like cops. The individuals suspected are charged with robbing nearly $2,000 from five victims during four separate incidents in one month. Police are still looking for the third suspect. During the robberies,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A man and a woman were arrested for committing a string of robberies in Santa Ana while impersonating police officers. Robbers were acting like cops. The individuals suspected are charged with robbing nearly $2,000 from five victims during four separate incidents in one month. Police are still looking for the third suspect.</p>



<p>During the robberies, one of the suspects was wearing a security-type uniform and carried a handgun. The other suspect wore all black clothing and a jacket that said SECURITY. Santa Ana Police Commander said, “The suspects’ demeanor was that of police officers and the victims did not realize they were being robbed until the suspects fled with their money.”</p>



<p>Robbery, a felony, may be punished by 3 to 6 years in State Prison. California Penal Code Section 211 defines robbery as the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear. Fear means fear of injury to oneself or the person’s family or property or to someone in one’s company. The value of the property taken does not matter.</p>



<p>An important element for robbery to be established is force or fear. Only an experienced criminal defense attorney can present a robbery defense by demonstrating that no force or fear was used to take the property or to prevent the victim from resisting. See also Penal Code Sections 211, 212.5 and 213; Criminal Law Updates from the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Teenager Suspected in Robbery Shot by Officer]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-teenager-suspected-in-robbery-shot-by-officer/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-teenager-suspected-in-robbery-shot-by-officer/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[juvenile]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Probation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Orange County Police followed a vehicle suspected of being used in a robbery. When the police approached the vehicle one of the teenage suspects stabbed an officer who then shot the teenager dead. The remaining two suspects then fled in the vehicle before they were stopped again and arrested. All three teenagers had prior records.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Orange County Police followed a vehicle suspected of being used in a robbery. When the police approached the vehicle one of the teenage suspects stabbed an officer who then shot the teenager dead. The remaining two suspects then fled in the vehicle before they were stopped again and arrested. All three teenagers had prior records. The suspect who was killed had priors for auto theft, assault and burglary. The driver was on probation for robbery, vandalism and auto theft. The remaining teenager, a female, was also on probation. All three were sixteen years of age. Under current law the two juveniles can be charged with anything the deceased teenage did if it was reasonably related to the crimes they were committing together. Juveniles can be tried in adult court if the District Attorney finds that the crimes were serious enough to warrant such treatment. See,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/juvenile-law.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Welfare and Institutions Code Section 602</a>,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-battery.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Penal Code Sections 245(a) (1)</a>&nbsp;[Assault with a Deadly Weapon]&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-batteryonapoliceofficier.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">243(c) (2) [Battery on a Peace Officer]</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Robbery Suspect Killed by Police]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-robbery-suspect-killed-by-police/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-robbery-suspect-killed-by-police/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Brea-police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penal-Code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[yorba-linda]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In Yorba Linda a robbery suspect was shot by Brea police outside his home. According to the Orange County Register Sgt Bill Smyser explained that he did not know whether there suspect was armed at the time. Police were outside Julian S. Collender’s home monitoring when he stepped out. Police fired one shot, he died&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In Yorba Linda a robbery suspect was shot by Brea police outside his home. According to the Orange County Register Sgt Bill Smyser explained that he did not know whether there suspect was armed at the time. Police were outside Julian S. Collender’s home monitoring when he stepped out. Police fired one shot, he died at the hospital. No details are given regarding why the police shot the suspect. Collender was a suspect regarding an armed robbery at a shopping center in Brea. The victims reported the incident stating that an armed man demanded their money and valuables. Police investigated Collender because one of the victims identified him as the assailant. Now Brea Police Department is conducting an interval investigation along with the District Attorney’s Office. See, Penal Code Section 211.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Puppy-napping in Los Angeles]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/puppy-napping-in-los-angeles/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/puppy-napping-in-los-angeles/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[puppy-napping]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A two-month-old English bulldog was taken from a 15-year-old boy in Los Angeles County on May 5, 2010. The man who committed the act is now being charged with second degree robbery in connection with the alleged “puppy-napping.” According to California Penal Code Section 211, robbery is the “felonious taking of personal property in the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="262" src="/static/2022/11/english_bulldog.jpg" alt="English bulldog " class="wp-image-1190"/></figure></div>


<p>A two-month-old English bulldog was taken from a 15-year-old boy in Los Angeles County on May 5, 2010. The man who committed the act is now being charged with second degree robbery in connection with the alleged “puppy-napping.” According to California Penal Code Section 211, robbery is the “felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.” Robbery of the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years according to Section 213(a) (2). Albiter was arrested when he took the boy’s puppy from him and after the young boy wrote down Albiter’s license plate number. The next week, police tracked the puppy to Albiter’s home. The puppy was not harmed and was subsequently returned to the family. Albiter was later released on a bail of $50,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Jeweler Tries to Make Most of Jewel Heist]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/jeweler-tries-to-make-most-of-jewel-heist/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/jeweler-tries-to-make-most-of-jewel-heist/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 01:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[jewelery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[westminster-police]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Westminster Police Department was called to investigate a robbery where a diamond courier was robbed by six armed assailants according to the Orange County Register. The owner of the jewelry business then filed a claim with the Westminster PD and his insurance company. The owner, Lior Bitton included in his claim that a 4.21&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="201" src="/static/2022/11/jewel.jpeg" alt="Jewel" class="wp-image-1200"/></figure></div>


<p>The Westminster Police Department was called to investigate a robbery where a diamond courier was robbed by six armed assailants according to the Orange County Register. The owner of the jewelry business then filed a claim with the Westminster PD and his insurance company. The owner, Lior Bitton included in his claim that a 4.21 carat diamond was one of the stolen diamonds. As the investigation proceeded detectives discovered that the 4.21k diamond had been taken by Bitton to Israel for an appraisal. That placed the diamond in Israel at the time of the robbery and not with the batch of jewels that had been taken. So, while it was determined the robbery did occur, the loss apparently did not include that particular diamond. Bitton was subsequently charged with filing a false insurance claim. His case is pending. See Penal Code Section 550.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Home Depot Killing Update]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/home-depot-killing-update/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/home-depot-killing-update/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Death-Penalty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Egan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[home-depot]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jason-Richardson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Tom-Egan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the latest news regarding the case of Tom Egan’s death during a Home Depot robbery, the jury has found Jason R. Richardson guilty of murder and various enhancements. A surveillance video from the incident shows a man with a dust mask and white coveralls in the store with a shot gun. The prosecutor described&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="/static/2022/11/jason-russell.jpg" alt="Photo Jason R. Richardson" class="wp-image-1231"/><figcaption>Jason Russell Richardson sits with his defense team during the opening statement phase of his murder trial April 12 at the Central Justice Center in Santa Ana.</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>In the latest news regarding the case of Tom Egan’s death during a Home Depot robbery, the jury has found Jason R. Richardson guilty of murder and various enhancements. A surveillance video from the incident shows a man with a dust mask and white coveralls in the store with a shot gun. The prosecutor described Richardson shooting Egan as a senseless act, practically disregarding human life over money in a cash register. The Public Defender’s argument was that Richardson reacted out of panic, basically an unplanned knee jerk reaction to Egan’s presence. The enhancements to the murder count subjects Richardson to the possibility of a death penalty sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Robbery at Kohl’s in Orange County]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/robbery-at-kohls-in-orange-county/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/robbery-at-kohls-in-orange-county/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[armed-robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cypress]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Irvine]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kohls]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penal-Code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[stolen-goods]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[suspect]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A second Orange County Kohl’s store was robbed in a period of just two days. The first Kohl’s robbery occurred in Cypress where the suspects are still at large. The first robbery involved two women who stole $520.00 worth of cologne and silver jewelry. The second robbery involved a man who used a weapon to&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="236" src="/static/2022/12/kohls.jpg" alt="Kohl's store" class="wp-image-1310"/></figure></div>


<p>A second Orange County Kohl’s store was robbed in a period of just two days. The first Kohl’s robbery occurred in Cypress where the suspects are still at large. The first robbery involved two women who stole $520.00 worth of cologne and silver jewelry. The second robbery involved a man who used a weapon to steal jewelry from the Irvine Kohl’s. No gun, however, was ever recovered. Police utilized a “reverse 911 call” to warn Irvine residents to stay indoors as police searched for the suspect on the afternoon of February 25th. Two schools were also locked down. Police have now apprehended a suspect who they believe to be the one who carried out the armed robbery (Penal Code Sections 211 and <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-battery.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">245(a)</a> (1)). He was found walking in the courtyard of an apartment community in Irvine. No estimate of the stolen goods has yet been given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Man Wearing a Bike Helmet Robs Bank]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-man-wearing-a-bike-helmet-robs-bank/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-man-wearing-a-bike-helmet-robs-bank/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[bike-helmet]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-sheriff]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[unlawful-injury]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[us-bank]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Investigators at the Orange County Sheriff’s Department as well as the FBI are investigating a strange robbery that occurred at a U.S. Bank in Lake Forest, Orange County on January 11th. A man wearing a bicycle helmet went inside the bank and held a teller at gunpoint while demanding cash. He handed the teller a&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="213" src="/static/2022/12/helmet.jpg" alt="Bike Helmet " class="wp-image-1373"/></figure></div>


<p>Investigators at the Orange County Sheriff’s Department as well as the FBI are investigating a strange robbery that occurred at a U.S. Bank in Lake Forest, Orange County on January 11th. A man wearing a bicycle helmet went inside the bank and held a teller at gunpoint while demanding cash. He handed the teller a note and then took the note back and left the bank. He was not seen getting into a vehicle or, more importantly, on any bicycle.<br><br>California Penal Code Section 211 defines robbery as “the felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.” The fear may be either that of an unlawful injury to the person or property of the person robbed or of any relative of his or member of his family; OR the fear of an immediate and unlawful injury to the person or property of anyone in the company of the person robbed at the time of the robbery.<br><br>Because the U.S. Bank teller was held at gunpoint, he/she was most likely placed in fear of his/her life, thereby constituting a robbery. When no force or fear is involved in the taking of personal property, it is simply a theft, carrying a less serious punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Dog Ordinance is Helping to Bring Down Gang Crime]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dog-ordinance-is-helping-to-bring-down-gang-crime/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dog-ordinance-is-helping-to-bring-down-gang-crime/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[aggravated-assault]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[animal-care]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[gang-crime]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Lancaster]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[los-angeles-county]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[physical-harm]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[pit-bulls]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[rex-parris]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[rottweilers]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>An ordinance, adopted January 2009, in the city of Lancaster in Los Angeles County is seeing positive results after imposing stiff penalties on dog owners. Owners of “potentially dangerous” and “vicious” dogs such as pit bulls and Rottweilers are prevented from using their dogs to bully people or cause physical harm to others. Since the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="/static/2022/12/dog-ordinance.jpg" alt="Dog Ordinance" class="wp-image-1350"/></figure></div>


<p>An ordinance, adopted January 2009, in the city of Lancaster in Los Angeles County is seeing positive results after imposing stiff penalties on dog owners. Owners of “potentially dangerous” and “vicious” dogs such as pit bulls and Rottweilers are prevented from using their dogs to bully people or cause physical harm to others.<br><br>Since the passage of the law, the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control impounded 1,138 pit bulls and Rottweilers and of those, 362 were voluntarily surrendered by owners.<br><br>Lancaster’s Mayor, R. Rex Parris, said that a year ago “these individuals delighted in the danger these animals posed to our residents, often walking them without leashes and allowing them to run rampant through our neighborhoods and parks.” According to Parris, Lancaster is a lot safer now since the ordinance was passed. Parris said there was a 45% drop in Lancaster’s violent gang crime, which includes homicide (Penal Code Section 187), <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/rape.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">rape</a>(Penal Code Section 220), robbery (Penal Code Section 211) and <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-battery.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">aggravated assault</a> (Penal Code Section 245(a) (1).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>