<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Illegal-Drugs - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/illegal-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/illegal-drugs/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:45:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[PROP 47: Non-Violent Offenses Including Theft and Drug Offenses Can Only Be Misdemeanors]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/prop-47-non-violent-offenses-including-theft-and-drug-offenses-can-only-be-misdemeanors/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/prop-47-non-violent-offenses-including-theft-and-drug-offenses-can-only-be-misdemeanors/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 05:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[County-Jail]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Defense-Attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Felony]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Illegal-Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jail-Time]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Misdemeanor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Petty-Theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Possession]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prop 47]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>On November 4, 2014, California voters approved a voter initiative which requires that certain crimes MUST be filed as misdemeanors. This appears to be an effort by the state of California to reduce the number of people in the state prison system. From now on theft offenses for less than $950.00 must be filed as&nbsp;misdemeanors-even&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="250" height="350" src="/static/2022/11/criminal-defense.jpeg" alt="Petty theft cases" class="wp-image-776" srcset="/static/2022/11/criminal-defense.jpeg 250w, /static/2022/11/criminal-defense-214x300.jpeg 214w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px" /></figure></div>


<p>On November 4, 2014, California voters approved a voter initiative which requires that certain crimes MUST be filed as misdemeanors. This appears to be an effort by the state of California to reduce the number of people in the state prison system. From now on theft offenses for less than $950.00 must be filed as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/about-your-case/misdemeanors.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">misdemeanors</a>-even if the person has an extensive prior record of theft offenses. This is significant because a person can only be sentenced to one (1) year or less on a misdemeanor and he stays in the county facility where the crime was committed. Previously, three or more petty theft cases for very small amounts could land a person in prison under Penal Code Section 666. However, that is no longer the case and the person cannot be sentenced to more than one year and cannot go to prison no matter how many petty theft cases he has under Proposition 47. Notably, the maximum jail penalty on a petty theft is 6 months, so from this point on it would appear that no matter how many prior&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/theft.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">petty theft convictions&nbsp;</a>you have, as long as they are under $950.00, you cannot be sentenced to more than 6 months in jail.</p>



<p>Notably, if you are in prison for multiple petty thefts or grand thefts and the last case that sent you to prison involved a value of less than $950.00, you can be&nbsp;<strong>resentenced</strong>&nbsp;on this matter, meaning that the court will review the case and remove you from state prison and have you serve more than likely a much shorter sentence in the county jail. There may be some exceptions to this if you have prior violent convictions. The law is still being fleshed out but you can petition to have your case reviewed&nbsp;<strong>IMMEDIATELY</strong>&nbsp;if you fall into any of these categories. The only exception to that is if the court finds you are public safety risk. The definition of that seems vague and would probably be a determination made by the Judge.</p>



<p>Also drug offenses wherein the person is only charged with personal use because he only has a personal use amount on him, MUST now be filed as a misdemeanor. Meaning, once again that the person cannot do more than one year in jail. Previously, an individual was facing a maximum of 3 years on possession of a personal use amount of any controlled substance except for marijuana possession for personal use which has always been a misdemeanor and sometimes an infraction.</p>



<p>So for example, possession of methamphetamine under&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/possession-controlled-substance.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Health and Safety Code Section 11377(a)</a>&nbsp;can only be filed as a misdemeanor; normally it is filed as a felony although it can be filed as either. Where this new law will really make a difference is when people are charged with possession of cocaine or heroin under Health and Safety Code Section 11352(a) which previously was only filed as a felony. Now those individuals are only facing misdemeanors which reduces their exposure to a year in county jail.</p>



<p>What will be interesting to see is what happens to people in the Penal Code Section 1210 program also known as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/about-your-case/prop36.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Prop 36</a>. It was the case that multiple fall outs from the program for personal use alone could land you in prison. However, under this new law it seems like the most the court can do for fall outs from possession for personal use is sentence the person to one year in county jail.</p>



<p>For first time offenders Prop 47 will have little practical effect but for individuals with multiple convictions this law could make a huge difference in their sentence. Please contact Attorney Will Bruzzo if you have any questions about your particular situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Capture of Leader of Mexican Drug Cartel]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/capture-of-leader-of-mexican-drug-cartel/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/capture-of-leader-of-mexican-drug-cartel/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cartel]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drug-Deals]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Illegal-Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[mexican-authorities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[street-drugs]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Mexico continues its battle with drug cartels and this past July officials captured the leader of the Zetas. Miguel Angel Treviño Morales had been the leader of the drug cartel the Zetas since October 2012. He was a member of Los Zetas during the time the group worked as an enforcement arm for the Gulf&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Mexico continues its battle with drug cartels and this past July officials captured the leader of the Zetas. Miguel Angel Treviño Morales had been the leader of the drug cartel the Zetas since October 2012. He was a member of Los Zetas during the time the group worked as an enforcement arm for the Gulf cartel. A portion of the members were ex-military that had left their elite unit.</p>



<p>Treviño Morales on the other hand was a civilian that managed to work his way up to top positions. In 2010 Los Zetas broke off from the Gulf Cartel and established themselves as the largest dangerous cartel. Treviño Morales became their leader when founder Heriberto Lazcano died in October 2010. It is alleged that the captured leader had ordered hundreds of Central American migrants killed or tortured because they would not become drug mules or for other reasons.</p>



<p>Mexican naval forces and ground troops captured him and two lieutenants at dawn on July 16. He carried $2 million in cash and eight guns. President Enrique Peña Nieto had explained he would focus on local level law enforcement to handle drug cartels as opposed to taking down top leaders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[California Voters to Have Final Word on Pot Dispensaries]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/california-voters-to-have-final-word-on-pot-dispensaries/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/california-voters-to-have-final-word-on-pot-dispensaries/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[federal-policy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[health-and-safety-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Illegal-Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[medical-marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The discussion regarding legalizing marijuana and dispensaries in LA County continues to be in the spotlight. With the number of dispensaries growing in the county the debate of the impact of such establishments on the community is growing as well. There is the side that argues marijuana proves to be useful for managing medical conditions&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The discussion regarding legalizing marijuana and dispensaries in LA County continues to be in the spotlight. With the number of dispensaries growing in the county the debate of the impact of such establishments on the community is growing as well. There is the side that argues marijuana proves to be useful for managing medical conditions that involve pain. It has also been suggested that there is a significant amount of revenue the state could gain from legalizing pot (as well as a way to address the state fiscal crisis while not raising taxes). With more then four thousand signatures currently, a petition has been circling in order to add the issue to the November 2010 ballot. Federal policy has shifted for certain aspects of possession of a limited amount of marijuana, refocusing efforts on other fronts of the illegal drug trade instead. California voters could vote to allow local authorities like cities and counties to draft their own laws regarding medicinal marijuana. (See Health and Safety Code Section 11357(a, b), [H&S 11357(a), (b), Health and Safety Code Section 11358, [H&S 11358], Health and Safety Code Section 11360(a, b), [H&S 11360].<br><br>Here is KCAL9 News reporting recently on the Los Angeles City Council’s decision to delay a medical marijuana dispensary vote until January 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Holiday Concerns: DUI Checkpoints]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/holiday-concerns-dui-checkpoints/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/holiday-concerns-dui-checkpoints/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[alcohol-related-traffic-collisions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[checkpoint]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[drinking]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dui]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[holidays]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Illegal-Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[prescription-medication]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sobriety]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sobriety-checkpoint]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>DUI checkpoints were determined to be legal by the United States Supreme Court; however, there are strict guidelines which must be followed. In California, many drivers do not know about these rules. For example, police must use a neutral mathematical formula, such as every driver, or every third, fifth, or tenth driver to determine who&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>DUI checkpoints were determined to be legal by the United States Supreme Court; however, there are strict guidelines which must be followed. In California, many drivers do not know about these rules. For example, police must use a neutral mathematical formula, such as every driver, or every third, fifth, or tenth driver to determine who to stop. So an officer may not stop an individual driver without a legitimate basis. Furthermore, police operating DUI checkpoints may only detain each driver long enough to question him/her and look for signs of intoxication, such as alcohol on breath, slurred speech, and glassy or bloodshot eyes. If the driver does not display signs of impairment, he/she should be permitted to leave without any further delay. If the driver is ordered out of the vehicle and asked to perform a field sobriety test (i.e. walking in a straight line, touching your nose or reciting the alphabet), he/she may refuse. The officer may also ask to search the car. The driver may refuse that request as the officers do not have legal grounds to search the car. Many times, officers don’t follow all the rules. In such instances, the stop may be considered illegal, and any evidence establishing the crime of driving under the influence may be thrown out. The California case controlling this area is Ingersoll v Palmer 241 Cal. Rptr. 42 (Cal. 1987).<br><br>However, if impairment is observed, then the driver may be taken to a separate area for field sobriety tests and further investigation, which must be based on probable cause.<br><br>In Orange County, the Garden Grove and Santa Ana police departments conducted DUI checkpoints from 7 p.m. Saturday to 3 a.m. on Sunday, December 13, 2009. The checkpoints were planned for Westminster Avenue near Enterprise Drive and Susan Street. Officials say there have been many fatal collisions involving drunk drivers on Westminster Avenue. The California government website reports that “early 23,000 people are killed every year in alcohol-related traffic collisions” and “one American life is lost every 22 minutes in an alcohol-related traffic collision.” Officers also look for those driving without a valid license. The checkpoints focused on drivers who have been drinking alcohol, using illegal drugs or abusing prescription medications while driving.<br><br>So please be weary of DUI checkpoints when you’re out on the road, as the consequences for a DUI can be very serious. This can include license suspension, high fines and possible jail time. Most importantly, don’t drink excessively-live to see the holidays next year.<br><br>Here is a Garden Grove TV3 News Video which covers the Garden Grove Police Department sobriety checkpoint on October 24, 2009:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Garden Grove Police Dept. - DUI Checkpoint" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/GqmwmZ-jfes?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>