<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Jails - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/jails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/jails/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2024 00:45:39 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Local Jails Decline to Honor ICE Requests for Holds on Inmates]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/local-jails-decline-to-honor-ice-requests-for-holds-on-inmates/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/local-jails-decline-to-honor-ice-requests-for-holds-on-inmates/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ice]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Illegal-Immigrants]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Immigration-And-Customs-Enforcement]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>According to the&nbsp;LA Times&nbsp;Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) says that local detention agencies (like county jails) are disregarding immigration hold requests and releasing inmates. From January to August of this year about 8.3% requests from ICE have not been honored. Across the country agencies have different reason for no longer holding people for ICE citing&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>According to the&nbsp;<em><strong>LA Times</strong></em>&nbsp;Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) says that local detention agencies (like county jails) are disregarding immigration hold requests and releasing inmates. From January to August of this year about 8.3% requests from ICE have not been honored. Across the country agencies have different reason for no longer holding people for ICE citing legal issues or department policy. Typically inmates that are in the U.S. illegally are not allowed to be released on bail even after they have completed their jail sentence. A 48 hour immigration hold keeps them in custody until federal agents arrive to take them to immigration court proceedings. One ICE officer in Los Angeles explains that personnel have been shifted to going out into the field and locating illegal immigrants instead of transporting detainees from jails because of this change.</p>



<p>This shift by local agencies stems from two reasons: Some departments cite the legality of upholding such a request. California for example, has a law that limits immigration detainers. As a result law enforcement departments have reduced their compliance with such requests. In Oregon a court ruled that it was violation of a woman’s constitutional rights to be held in custody without probable cause. The Riverside County Chief Deputy cites this court ruling as a reason they do not hold people. Explaining that if they did hold people the department could be held liable in civil court. Another reason is a memo distributed by ICE explaining that immigration holds were “requests not requirements” according to the&nbsp;<em><strong>LA Times</strong></em>.</p>



<p>The second reason comes from departments trying to keep a good relationship with the communities they serve. Some officers explain that deportation threats scare people from reporting crimes. This makes communities unsafe and creates a break down between police and residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[33,000 Inmates from State Prisons to be Released]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/33000-inmates-from-state-prisons-to-be-released/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/33000-inmates-from-state-prisons-to-be-released/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inmates]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[LA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sex-offenders]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>After an order from the U.S. Supreme Court, California has to eliminate 33,000 inmates from its prisons due to overcrowding and basically inhumane conditions. Inmates will be released, sent to other states or sent to county jails to serve their sentences. Various county officials expressed their reservations over the reduction plan which has to be&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>After an order from the U.S. Supreme Court, California has to eliminate 33,000 inmates from its prisons due to overcrowding and basically inhumane conditions. Inmates will be released, sent to other states or sent to county jails to serve their sentences. Various county officials expressed their reservations over the reduction plan which has to be carried out over a period of two years. Another concern is for the condition of the county jails. An attorney with the ACLU explains that the county jails also have terrible conditions. L.A. County Supervisor Mike Antonovich said that L.A. County does not have mental health program in its jails or the money to house additional offenders. According to the NPR report, low level offenders will most likely be sent to county jails while violent felons or sex offenders will not. In order to take on more inmates L.A. County needs more staff, more space and more mental and medical services, all of which mean more money is needed. California is currently struggling with its budget and many sectors are or will face serious budget cuts. Throwing more money into the jail system means more revenue has to be generated or allocated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[White Powder]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/white-powder/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/white-powder/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 04:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[costa-mesa]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[false-weapon]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[judicial-data-system]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[poolman]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[white-powder]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[William-Louis-Poolman]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>William Louis Poolman sent a check to the Judicial Data Systems in Costa Mesa in order to pay a ticket. The ticket was for $68.50 for not paying parking fees at Carpentaria State Beach. He had appealed the ticket according to the Orange County Register but did not win. When the payment was received the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="225" src="/static/2022/11/white-powder.jpg" alt="White Powder" class="wp-image-1222"/></figure></div>


<p>William Louis Poolman sent a check to the Judicial Data Systems in Costa Mesa in order to pay a ticket. The ticket was for $68.50 for not paying parking fees at Carpentaria State Beach. He had appealed the ticket according to the Orange County Register but did not win. When the payment was received the enveloped also contained a copy of his denied appeal and white powder. Authorities examined the powder and determined it was not hazardous. Poolman was arrested and faces a felony charge of false or facsimile weapon of mass destruction. He faces prison or jail time if convicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Deputies bring Lawsuit to Stop Early Release of Inmates]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-deputies-bring-lawsuit-to-stop-early-release-of-inmates/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-deputies-bring-lawsuit-to-stop-early-release-of-inmates/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[early-release]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inmates]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kevin-peterson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[loren-mcmaster]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-sheriff]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sacramento]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The union representing around 1,800 deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department filed a lawsuit on February 16, 2010 to stop the early release of inmates from Orange County jails. This lawsuit, modeled after the one filed in Sacramento County, is the second one of its kind. In the Sacramento case, the judge issued a&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The union representing around 1,800 deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department filed a lawsuit on February 16, 2010 to stop the early release of inmates from Orange County jails. This lawsuit, modeled after the one filed in Sacramento County, is the second one of its kind. In the Sacramento case, the judge issued a temporary restraining order halting the release of inmates under the new state law SB X3 18. Superior Court Judge Loren E. McMaster ruled that “the law was intended for state, not county inmates, and that the release of inmates into the streets while the number of deputies is being reduced is a ‘formula for disaster'” (Orange County Register). Attorneys representing the union argued that the state law, which went into effect January 25th, was meant to affect state prisons only, not county jails. Between January 25th and February 9th, 311 inmates have been released early from Orange County jails. Other counties, such as Los Angeles, are applying the law differently and in turn not releasing any inmates early. In the present suit, attorneys have also cited an inmate who was released early from Sacramento County jail on charges of assault with a deadly weapon who then went on to attempt to rape a woman just hours after his release. Kevin Peterson’s case is commonly referred to by law enforcement officials when stating opposition to this new law.<br></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A Training Class, As Opposed to Jail Time]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/a-training-class-as-opposed-to-jail-time/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/a-training-class-as-opposed-to-jail-time/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[District-Attorney]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[good-samaritan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[hit-and-run]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[justice-system]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[seinfeld]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vehicle-Code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Every generation finds an iconic author who writes stories about everyday people to whom the public can relate. From the 1820’s to the late 1960’s The Saturday Evening Post served this purpose. As television became more a part of our lives people would often remark “there was an I Love Lucy episode about this!” Since&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Every generation finds an iconic author who writes stories about everyday people to whom the public can relate. From the 1820’s to the late 1960’s The Saturday Evening Post served this purpose. As television became more a part of our lives people would often remark “there was an I Love Lucy episode about this!” Since the 1989 it has not been unusual to hear people say “Wasn’t there a Seinfeld episode about this?”<br><br>In 1992 episode 20 of Seinfeld’s third season was titled “The Good Samaritan”. You might remember this episode. According to Wikipedia the basic plot is “Jerry witnesses a hit-and-run driver hitting another car. He is on the car phone with Elaine at the time, who tells him he has to go after the driver. He does, but when the driver steps out he realizes that she is a beautiful woman (played by Melinda McGraw) and decides to date her.”<br><br>Today’s post isn’t really about comedy, it is about being charged with a hit and run, but on occasion comedy is the best teacher. Moliere, the17th century French playwright, once said: “The duty of comedy is to correct men by amusing them.”<br><br>The truth is every hit and run is serious, not amusing. It is an offense that is not to be taken lightly. It never is by those on the receiving end of the act. While the justice system also serves to correct men and women, it does not do this by amusing them. But the justice system on occasion corrects men and women by offering a training class, as opposed to jail time.<br><br>Here is one client’s experience:<br><br>“I was charged with hit and run (<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/hit-and-run.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Vehicle Code Section 20002</a>) for striking a vehicle and leaving the scene. I hired Attorney William Bruzzo to represent me in this case as I was told he is very familiar with the courts and the district attorneys in Orange County. In the end Mr. Bruzzo was able to negotiate a disposition where the District Attorney agreed to DISMISS THE CASE after I took a class. I am truly grateful to Mr. Bruzzo for his representation in this matter as it spared me from going to jail and having a conviction on my record as it would greatly affect my teaching career. I would enthusiastically recommend Mr. Bruzzo for any criminal matter.” ~ EH, 1/21/2010<br><br><em>Criminal Law Updates by The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636</em><br><br>Enjoy a clip from the Seinfeld’s “The Good Samaritan” episode</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Helen Slater - Seinfeld" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Oq-1CtCPUyo?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Tornado Warning in Orange County]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tornado-warning-in-orange-county/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tornado-warning-in-orange-county/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[huntington-beach]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[national-weather-service]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[reckless-driving]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Riverside-County]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[severe-weather-conditions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[trabuco-canyon-road]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vehicle-Code]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday, January 19, 2010, the National Weather Service gave out a tornado warning for Orange County as thunderstorms headed in that direction. Several vehicle incidents were reported due to the severe weather conditions. Winds flipped over a car in Huntington Beach in Orange County and deputies had to push a stalled BMW SUV out of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="320" height="241" src="/static/2022/12/tornado.jpg" alt="Tornado Warning" class="wp-image-1359" srcset="/static/2022/12/tornado.jpg 320w, /static/2022/12/tornado-300x226.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px" /></figure></div>


<p>Tuesday, January 19, 2010, the National Weather Service gave out a tornado warning for Orange County as thunderstorms headed in that direction. Several vehicle incidents were reported due to the severe weather conditions. Winds flipped over a car in Huntington Beach in Orange County and deputies had to push a stalled BMW SUV out of the water on the highway. Just south of Riverside County, road crews scraped mud off the roadway thereby closing Ortega Highway. Mud and debris were also blocking lanes at Trabuco Canyon Road. Indeed, drivers have some challenging conditions to deal with in this torrential downpour. Notably, drivers must modify their driving practices to reflect all driving conditions to include weather. Reckless driving (Vehicle Code Section 23103) can be a violation drivers get cited for in such weather conditions. Persons may be charged if driving in a “willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.” Punishment can be up to 90 days in jail, in addition to a maximum fine of $1,000. Drivers should take necessary precautions and drive according to road conditions in addition to posted speed limits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[DUI Arrests Made at Checkpoints]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dui-arrests-made-at-checkpoints/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dui-arrests-made-at-checkpoints/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Blood-Alcohol]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[California-Vehicle-Code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[checkpoint]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Driving-Under-The-Influence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[drunk]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dui]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[prescription-drugs]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A total of 17 arrests were made for suspicion of drunk driving at two checkpoints in Orange County in the city of Garden Grove over the weekend before Christmas. Police have impounded 38 vehicles for drunk driving to include drivers who were driving without a valid license. California Vehicle Code 23152(a) [VC 23152 (a)] prohibits&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="170" height="170" src="/static/2022/12/dui-sign.jpg" alt="DUI checkpoint" class="wp-image-1409" srcset="/static/2022/12/dui-sign.jpg 170w, /static/2022/12/dui-sign-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 170px) 100vw, 170px" /></figure></div>


<p>A total of 17 arrests were made for suspicion of drunk driving at two checkpoints in Orange County in the city of Garden Grove over the weekend before Christmas. Police have impounded 38 vehicles for drunk driving to include drivers who were driving without a valid license.<br><br><a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/dui.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">California Vehicle Code 23152</a>(a) [VC 23152 (a)] prohibits any person from driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Note that an amount of drugs is not specified so any amount of drugs or alcohol that impairs one driving as determined by the arresting officer and/or eventually a jury, can cause one to be convicted of that crime. Drugs can include prescription drugs taken as directed! This is distinct from California Vehicle Code 23152 (b) [VC 23152 (b)] which prohibits driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol level over 0.08. The driver must be at or over the legal limit for vehicle code section 23152 (b) to apply. Also, it only applies to drivers under the influence of alcohol. A first time DUI carries a maximum sentence of 6 months in jail and a $1500.00 fine; however, most first time DUI offenders do no jail time as long as there was no accident or other aggravating factor.<br><br>In order for a “stop” to be valid at a DUI checkpoint, the police must follow certain rules. If they fail to follow the rules the stop can be ruled invalid and the evidence collected excluded which can cause the case to be dismissed regardless of the blood alcohol level or other evidence. The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo has substantial experience working with checkpoint/DUI cases. </p>



<p>California Vehicle Code Section 12500 (a) states: “A person may not drive a motor vehicle upon a highway, unless the person then holds a valid driver’s license issued under this code, except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code.” </p>



<p>Driving without a valid driver’s license in California is a “wobbler” – meaning, depending on the circumstances, prosecutors can charge this offense as a misdemeanor or infraction. The police can charge you with a violation of this vehicle code section for any of the following: (1) never obtaining a driver’s license, (2) failing to renew your driver’s license after expiring, (3) failing to obtain a California driver’s license after establishing residency, or (4) being ineligible for a drivers license in this state (for example, being an illegal immigrant).<br><br>The main factor that prosecution looks at in deciding whether to charge you with a misdemeanor or an infraction is your driving record. If this is your first offense or if you subsequently obtain a valid driver’s license, they may charge you only with the infraction or even go on to dismiss the case with the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney.<br><br>One can receive up to six months in jail for the above misdemeanor offense as well as informal probation for up to three years and a maximum fine of $1,000.<br><br>As the New Year Holiday begins, remember don’t drink and drive, use a designated driver. Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>