<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Los-Angeles - Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/los-angeles-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/tags/los-angeles-2/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 08:59:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Defending Against Fraud Charges In Orange County Business Districts]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/defending-against-fraud-charges-in-orange-county-business-districts/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/defending-against-fraud-charges-in-orange-county-business-districts/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 08:55:09 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud Charges In Orange County Business Districts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Orange County Fraud Defense Lawyer]]></category>
                
                
                
                    <media:thumbnail url="https://bruzzolaw-com.justia.site/wp-content/uploads/sites/110/2026/02/view-of-dowtown-la-traffic-with-with-skyscrapers-i-2026-01-11-10-28-41-utc.jpg" />
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Fraud charges can threaten more than your freedom. They can affect your career, professional licensing, and reputation in a way that lingers long after court ends. In Orange County business districts like Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach, investigations may start quietly through audits, complaints, or subpoenas.&nbsp; At The Law Offices of William&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Fraud charges can threaten more than your freedom. They can affect your career, professional licensing, and reputation in a way that lingers long after court ends. In Orange County business districts like Irvine, Santa Ana, Costa Mesa, and Newport Beach, investigations may start quietly through audits, complaints, or subpoenas.&nbsp;</p>



<p>At The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo, we defend clients facing serious allegations, and our Orange County criminal defense lawyer can step in early to protect your rights and your future, especially in cases that fall under<a href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/white-collar-crime-defense-understanding-your-legal-options/?utm_source=chatgpt.com"> white collar crime defense</a>.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-makes-fraud-cases-different-from-other-criminal-charges">What Makes Fraud Cases Different From Other Criminal Charges?</h2>



<p>Fraud cases often revolve around documents and intent. Prosecutors try to prove you meant to deceive or unlawfully benefit. Evidence may include emails and messages taken out of context, accounting records, bank activity, and summaries prepared by third parties. Many agencies treat these cases as high-impact because they can cause major financial harm. In fact, the <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/white-collar-crime">FBI explains</a> that these offenses are non-violent but not “victimless,” and they can destroy businesses and wipe out savings.</p>



<p>A defense attorney will not treat a business dispute like a criminal case without proof. We focuses on whether the evidence truly shows intent or whether it shows misunderstanding, poor recordkeeping, or a civil disagreement. That intent element is often the pressure point that makes or breaks the prosecution’s case.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-what-to-expect-during-an-orange-county-fraud-investigation">What To Expect During An Orange County Fraud Investigation</h2>



<p>Many people learn they are under investigation before an arrest ever happens. Investigators may request an interview, contact your employer, or serve subpoenas for records. You may feel pressure to “clear it up,” but that can backfire, especially if you guess at details, explain records you have not reviewed, or hand over communications without context.</p>



<p>Our Orange County fraud defense lawyer can manage communications, prevent misstatements from being framed as admissions, preserve helpful records, and challenge how evidence was gathered, including searches and device seizures. Early involvement also helps with document preservation so you do not lose emails, logs, or records that support your defense.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-defense-strategies-that-can-reduce-or-end-a-fraud-case">Defense Strategies That Can Reduce Or End A Fraud Case</h2>



<p>Fraud cases are often beatable when the evidence does not match what the prosecutor is claiming, especially on intent and financial records. A strong defense typically focuses on:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Intent: showing misunderstanding, clerical error, or lack of a plan to deceive</li>



<li>Records and transactions: challenging incomplete spreadsheets, inaccurate summaries, or missing source documents</li>



<li>Accuser credibility: pointing out bias, retaliation, or financial motives behind the complaint</li>



<li>Evidence issues: moving to exclude evidence from unlawful searches, improper seizures, or overbroad warrants</li>
</ul>



<p>The goal is to expose weak points early and push for a reduction or dismissal when the prosecution cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-schedule-a-consultation-with-our-orange-county-fraud-defense-lawyer">Schedule A Consultation With Our Orange County Fraud Defense Lawyer</h2>



<p>If you are facing fraud allegations, do not wait until charges escalate. The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo represents clients across Orange County and understands how high-stakes accusations can affect careers and families. For help from an Orange County criminal defense attorney, call The Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo at (714) 547-4636 and <a href="https://www.bruzzolaw.com/contact-us/">contact us online</a> for a confidential consultation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[LAPD Effort to Limit Auto Impounds Is Voided By Judge]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/lapd-effort-to-limit-auto-impounds-is-voided-by-judge/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/lapd-effort-to-limit-auto-impounds-is-voided-by-judge/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Speical Order 7]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vehicle Impound]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer will appeal a judge’s ruling against the police department’s vehicle impound policy. Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck had developed a policy, Special Order 7, regarding vehicle impounds for unlicensed drivers. If the unlicensed driver has insurance, a valid identification card and no record for unlicensed driving, then&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Feuer.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="349" src="/static/2022/11/300px-Michael_Feuer.jpeg" alt="Mike Feuer" class="wp-image-806" srcset="/static/2022/11/300px-Michael_Feuer.jpeg 300w, /static/2022/11/300px-Michael_Feuer-258x300.jpeg 258w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a><figcaption>Mike Feuer (Photo credit: <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Feuer.jpg">Wikipedia</a>)</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>The Los Angeles City Attorney Mike Feuer will appeal a judge’s ruling against the police department’s vehicle impound policy. Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck had developed a policy, Special Order 7, regarding vehicle impounds for unlicensed drivers. If the unlicensed driver has insurance, a valid identification card and no record for unlicensed driving, then the vehicle will not be impounded. Those representing the police officers had sued against the policy, explaining that it attempted to override California Law. Police Chief Beck explained on October 27, that officers were told to disregard Special Order 7.</p>



<p>According to the&nbsp;<em><strong>L.A. Times</strong></em>, City Attorney Feuer was going to ask an appeals court to set aside the judge’s ruling while the appeal process takes place. The&nbsp;<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/03/local/la-me-immigrant-licenses-20131004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><em><strong>L.A. Time</strong></em>s also reported October 3, 2013</a>, that Governor Brown has signed a bill granting undocumented immigrants a driver’s license. The license will give a person a driving privilege but would not be acceptable for federal use, employment or to receive “public benefits.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Cops Get a New “App”]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/cops-get-a-new-app/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/cops-get-a-new-app/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[computer app]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[judicial-data-system]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Parole]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Probation]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday, September 9, 2013, that California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a computer application “app” for law enforcement. This app would be used on cell phones and tablets. The purpose would be to get an individual suspects information from state and federal databases. From the databases police officers would&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday, September 9, 2013, that California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a computer application “app” for law enforcement. This app would be used on cell phones and tablets. The purpose would be to get an individual suspects information from state and federal databases. From the databases police officers would know if the person is on parole or probation from their hand held device, not by returning to their patrol car or the police station. It saves time and gives them more information at an instant. San Francisco tested this app with 600 officers, and noticed improvement in their performance. The Los Angeles Police Department will try the app later on in the year. Security steps to access the app vary, including encryption, passwords and disabling copying or screen saves.</p>



<p><em><strong>CBS Los Angeles</strong></em> reports on the new “app.”</p>



<p>If you are having trouble viewing the video, you can <a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=9292084" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">see it here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Police Suspect Same Person of Stabbing Three Homeless Persons in Los Angeles]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/police-suspect-same-person-of-stabbing-three-homeless-persons-in-los-angeles/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/police-suspect-same-person-of-stabbing-three-homeless-persons-in-los-angeles/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 03:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[assault]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[assault-deadly-weapon]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[attempted-murder]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[los-angeles-times]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles Police Department’s robbery and homicide division are investigating three stabbing incidents. One incident occurred in Santa Monica the other two in Los Angeles. Three homeless people were stabbed by one suspect. According to the Los Angeles Times, police said they were searching for David Ben Keyes who has been missing from Santa&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Los Angeles Police Department’s robbery and homicide division are investigating three stabbing incidents. One incident occurred in Santa Monica the other two in Los Angeles. Three homeless people were stabbed by one suspect. According to the Los Angeles Times, police said they were searching for David Ben Keyes who has been missing from Santa Barbara. Now police state that the suspect’s real name is Courtney Anthony Robinson. The three victims survived the attacks. Two weapons have been recovered each from a different crime scene. One a black kitchen knife used in the Hollywood incident where a homeless woman was stabbed while she slept. The other was a hunting knife from the first attack on July 4th, the victim had been struck between the shoulder blades. The knife was still inserted in his back when he was helped. Notes have been left at all three sites. A note with the words “death warrants” and the suspect’s signature have been confirmed at two of the crime scenes.</p>



<p>Here is an NBC Los Angeles news report covering Mr. Robinson turning himself into LAPD.</p>



<p>If you are having trouble viewing this video, you can&nbsp;<a href="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Homeless-Stabbings-Courtney-Anthony-Robinson-Detained-163970076.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">see it here</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<p><em>Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Orange County Defense Lawyer</a>&nbsp;William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636</em></p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-related-articles">Related Articles</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/08/06/la-homeless-stabbings-suspect-faces-mental-evaluation/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LA Homeless Stabbings Suspect Faces Mental Evaluation Hearing&nbsp;</a>(losangeles.cbs.local.com)</li>



<li><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/3-la-area-homeless-people-found-stabbed-notes-041434992.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">3 LA-area homeless people found stabbed with notes</a>&nbsp;(news.yahoo.com)</li>



<li><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/07/death-warrant-stabbing-suspect-may-be-using-public-transit.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Death warrant’ stabbing suspect may be using public transit</a>&nbsp;(latimesblogs.latimes.com)</li>



<li><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/07/stabbing-save.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Death warrants’ left at scene of 3 homeless stabbings, LAPD says</a>&nbsp;(latimesblogs.latimes.com)</li>



<li><a href="http://www.kfiam640.com/pages/NEWS.html?article=10283003" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Homeless Stabbings</a>&nbsp;(kfiam640.com)</li>



<li><a href="http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2012/07/19/police-seek-person-of-interest-in-3-stabbings-of-homeless-people/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police Seek Person Of Interest In 3 Stabbings Of Homeless People</a>&nbsp;(losangeles.cbslocal.com)</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Red Light Camera Contract]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/red-light-camera-contract/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/red-light-camera-contract/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[red-light-camera]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[red-light-camera-contract]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The Los Angeles Police Commission will not renew the contract with the firm that operates the red-light cameras in the city. The information collected by the cameras will not be readily available to the police. The officers that attend the court hearings will not have the evidence required by the court to prove the violation.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Los Angeles Police Commission will not renew the contract with the firm that operates the red-light cameras in the city. The information collected by the cameras will not be readily available to the police. The officers that attend the court hearings will not have the evidence required by the court to prove the violation. For a red-light camera trial the cases would most likely be dismissed. However officials explain that there will be fines and records of the ticket. If the fine is not paid, an additional $300 will be added to the ticket cost. If the person receives another citation it will appear on the record. Also a red-light camera citation will appear in a background check. The Los Angeles City Council voted last summer to end the program and stopped issuing citations at the end of July according to the Los Angeles Times.</p>



<p>You can watch a KABC.com red-light camera video story below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Possible Serial Arsonist Caught in LA]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/possible-serial-arsonist-caught-in-la/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/possible-serial-arsonist-caught-in-la/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[arson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[arsonist]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[parking-lot-fires]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The LA Times reports that a person of interest of German nationality has been detained in connection with parking lot fires in Los Angeles. The multiple incidents have taken place in Hollywood, North Hollywood, West Hollywood and near Fairfax. There have been no injuries reported. News outlets reported on surveillance footage from a parking structure&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The LA Times reports that a person of interest of German nationality has been detained in connection with parking lot fires in Los Angeles. The multiple incidents have taken place in Hollywood, North Hollywood, West Hollywood and near Fairfax. There have been no injuries reported. News outlets reported on surveillance footage from a parking structure from one of the fires. The video shows a man between 20 to 30 years old, with a receding hairline and a ponytail whom authorities are calling a person of interest. Evidence is still being collected and police are working on clues and witness information. The incidents involve car fires in parking structures and apartment building carports, making residents in the area very nervous. Police have started to maintain better lit parking areas, and observe cars for evidence of tampering. See Penal Code Sections 450, 451.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[L.A. Loses Revenue When Rave Moved to Las Vegas]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/l-a-loses-revenue-when-rave-moved-to-las-vegas/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/l-a-loses-revenue-when-rave-moved-to-las-vegas/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[ecstasy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Electric-Daisy-Carnival]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Las-Vegas]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[overdose]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[rave]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>This year’s big rave concert, known as the Electric Daisy Carnival, will not be held at the L.A. Coliseum. The company in charge of the event, Insomniac Inc. will have the concert in Las Vegas instead. Unwanted attention had come to raves at the Coliseum after an incident last year when a teenager died from&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>This year’s big rave concert, known as the Electric Daisy Carnival, will not be held at the L.A. Coliseum. The company in charge of the event, Insomniac Inc. will have the concert in Las Vegas instead. Unwanted attention had come to raves at the Coliseum after an incident last year when a teenager died from an ecstasy overdose. The Coliseum commission lifted the subsequent suspension on having raves at the stadium in November 2010. Also it was determined that rave promoters had to come before the board 60 days prior to an event in order to get approval. Further investigations have been made into the connection between a Coliseum staffer and his employment with Insomniac Inc. He was in charge of event security planning for last years Electric Daisy Carnival and began working with Insomniac Inc. two months prior to the rave. There is also a concern for the lost revenue from the rave being moved. One official stated in the LA Times that the rave generated as much revenue as two USC football games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Is Gang Injunction Too Broad?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/is-gang-injunction-too-broad/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/is-gang-injunction-too-broad/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 21:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[curfew]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Gang-Activity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[gang-injuctions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penal-Code]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A legal battle is under way over gang injunctions in Los Angeles. One attorney is taking the matter to federal court in a lawsuit against the broad terms of curfews imposed by the injunction. The argument is that the wording is too general and fails to specifically explain the aspects of the curfew. A past&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A legal battle is under way over gang injunctions in Los Angeles. One attorney is taking the matter to federal court in a lawsuit against the broad terms of curfews imposed by the injunction. The argument is that the wording is too general and fails to specifically explain the aspects of the curfew. A past appellate court ruling decided that the term “outside” was too vague and more details were needed in order to define how someone would be in violation of the injunction. That ruling was ruled on an injunction for an Oxnard gang. The attorney for the current lawsuit, Olu Orange, states that because of the similarity in wording between the Oxnard injunction and 21 current LA injunctions, the latter injunctions violate a person’s due process rights. The injunctions serve as a method of limiting gang member’s activity. For example, known gang members are not allowed to carry weapons or socialize with each other. The curfew aspect of the injunctions bars a known gang member from being outside after 10 p.m. The case of a teenager being arrested for violating that curfew is what sparked the lawsuit. The teenager was included in the injunction because his older brother had links to known gang members. The younger brother does not belong to any gang according to the attorney. The boy was playing at the handball courts in the projects where he lives when he was arrested for violating curfew. See Penal Code Section 182.66.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[38th Street Gang Raided by Authorities]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/38th-street-gang-raided-by-authorities/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/38th-street-gang-raided-by-authorities/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[38th-street-gang]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cocaine]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[lapd]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[methamphetamine]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes what happens in Los Angeles seems like the stuff only Hollywood could imagine. Members of one of the most notorious and oldest gangs in Los Angeles, the 38th Street gang, were arrested in a federal indictment alleging murder and drug trafficking. Early morning raids, involving 800 law enforcement officers, resulted in the documentation of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes what happens in Los Angeles seems like the stuff only Hollywood could imagine. Members of one of the most notorious and oldest gangs in Los Angeles, the 38th Street gang, were arrested in a federal indictment alleging murder and drug trafficking. Early morning raids, involving 800 law enforcement officers, resulted in the documentation of various plots, including a 14 year old girl being directed to shoot a rival gang member as part of her initiation, and a raid in which gang members dressed themselves as FBI agents, shooting themselves into a South Gate home. The pre-dawn raids, conducted by LAPD, agents from the DEA and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives resulted in 37 arrests on federal charges, and 20 more on state weapons and narcotics charges.</p>



<p>Authorities seized about 7 kilograms of cocaine, a pound of methamphetamines, 23 firearms and a quarter million in cash. Allegedly the gang imports drugs from Mexico, and provided “street level” distribution in their gang territory.</p>



<p>If convicted, the defendants face punishment under California Health and Safety Code 11379 and 11372. See, also Penal Code Sections&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/child-abuse.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">273a(a)</a>, 211 and 186.22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Former USC Student Back in Court]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/former-usc-student-back-in-court/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/former-usc-student-back-in-court/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Holly-Ashcraft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Probation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[USC]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In 2005 former USC student, Holly Ashcraft, arrived at a Southern California Hospital showing signs of having just given birth. Police were unable to locate the infant which she claimed was still born. Los Angeles Prosecutors tried unsuccessfully to try her for murder but settled for a lesser child of endangerment in 2008. Ms. Ashcraft&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In 2005 former USC student, Holly Ashcraft, arrived at a Southern California Hospital showing signs of having just given birth. Police were unable to locate the infant which she claimed was still born. Los Angeles Prosecutors tried unsuccessfully to try her for murder but settled for a lesser child of endangerment in 2008. Ms. Ashcraft was put on probation which included requirements that she attend mandatory counseling and pregnancy testing. Last week a Los Angeles Judge found that she had not complied with all the terms of her probation and incarcerated her pending a hearing until January 3, 2011. <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/child-abuse.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Penal Code Sections 273a (a), 273a (b)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Deceased Infants Found in Chest From 1930s]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/deceased-infants-found-in-chest-from-1930s/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/deceased-infants-found-in-chest-from-1930s/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles Police Department is trying to piece together a mystery from decades ago. The bodies of two infants were found wrapped in newspapers from 1935 and 1937, in a trunk forgotten in a basement of a Westlake Apartment building. There are no signs of trauma on the bodies from an autopsy report; one is&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Los Angeles Police Department is trying to piece together a mystery from decades ago. The bodies of two infants were found wrapped in newspapers from 1935 and 1937, in a trunk forgotten in a basement of a Westlake Apartment building. There are no signs of trauma on the bodies from an autopsy report; one is of a newborn and the other a premature or aborted fetus. To find more information the agency will do a forensic examination to try and determine a cause of death. A DNA test will reveal if the two were related and maybe who the mother was. The investigation has not determined if there was a crime committed which means that any DNA gathering would have to be voluntarily. Police suspect that the infants may have been the result of an abortion carried out at a time when such practices were illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Shooting at Marijuana Dispensary]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/shooting-at-marijuana-dispensary/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/shooting-at-marijuana-dispensary/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dispensary]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[shooting]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles detectives are investigating another shooting at a marijuana dispensary. In Northridge this past weekend $11,000.00 was stolen from a dispensary, and an employee was shot in the face. He was taken to the hospital and was in critical condition according to a Los Angeles Times’ article. Days before on Thursday, June 24 two&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="200" height="229" src="/static/2022/11/pot-shop-neon-sign.jpeg" alt="Pot shop neon sign" class="wp-image-1113"/><figcaption>Photo by mares8 via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>Los Angeles detectives are investigating another shooting at a marijuana dispensary. In Northridge this past weekend $11,000.00 was stolen from a dispensary, and an employee was shot in the face. He was taken to the hospital and was in critical condition according to a Los Angeles Times’ article. Days before on Thursday, June 24 two stores in L.A. were held up. In Echo Park two employees were shot, one of them died. Another pot dispensary in Hollywood was also robbed; multiple robbers entered and killed one person during the incident. This activity has concerned officials but they have not established a connection between the three robberies. See, Penal Code Sections 211, <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/assault-battery.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">245</a>(a) (1) and 187.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The Positive Side]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/the-positive-side/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/the-positive-side/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[advancement-project]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[gang-intervention]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The City of Los Angeles has recently created gang intervention programs. While nonprofits and other organization work throughout the city providing the same services, the city is now adopting a gang prevention academy for those that want to work in that field. Classes train and educate people on gang issues, history and how to deal&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="198" src="/static/2022/11/gang-intervention-programs.jpeg" alt="Gang intervention programs" class="wp-image-1179"/></figure></div>


<p>The City of Los Angeles has recently created gang intervention programs. While nonprofits and other organization work throughout the city providing the same services, the city is now adopting a gang prevention academy for those that want to work in that field. Classes train and educate people on gang issues, history and how to deal with situations on the street. Alternatives to violence and how to handle a tense situation are discussed and scenarios explored. Some of the students in the academy are very familiar with these issues since its something they were involved with in the past. They have first hand experience of the split second decisions that can change lives forever. Students learn about public health issues, and immigration law among other things. The idea is to quell some of the tensions or prevent escalations of a situation. City officials, police and those involved in creating the program will now have to wait and see what happens once the first batch of graduates enters the field. The program is being run by the <a href="http://www.advancementprojectca.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Advancement Project</a> which is has contracted with the city. See Penal Code Section 186.22.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Puppy-napping in Los Angeles]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/puppy-napping-in-los-angeles/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/puppy-napping-in-los-angeles/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[puppy-napping]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[robbery]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A two-month-old English bulldog was taken from a 15-year-old boy in Los Angeles County on May 5, 2010. The man who committed the act is now being charged with second degree robbery in connection with the alleged “puppy-napping.” According to California Penal Code Section 211, robbery is the “felonious taking of personal property in the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="262" src="/static/2022/11/english_bulldog.jpg" alt="English bulldog " class="wp-image-1190"/></figure></div>


<p>A two-month-old English bulldog was taken from a 15-year-old boy in Los Angeles County on May 5, 2010. The man who committed the act is now being charged with second degree robbery in connection with the alleged “puppy-napping.” According to California Penal Code Section 211, robbery is the “felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.” Robbery of the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years according to Section 213(a) (2). Albiter was arrested when he took the boy’s puppy from him and after the young boy wrote down Albiter’s license plate number. The next week, police tracked the puppy to Albiter’s home. The puppy was not harmed and was subsequently returned to the family. Albiter was later released on a bail of $50,000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Lohan Escapes Jail]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/lohan-escapes-jail/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/lohan-escapes-jail/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 01:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Lindsay-Lohan]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Marsha-Revel]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Probation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Vehicle-Code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[warrant]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>A Los Angeles County Judge issued an arrest warrant for Lindsay Lohan for her failure to appear in court on May 20th. Lohan, who was scheduled to appear for her probation hearing for a 2007 driving under the Influence conviction, failed to show up. Instead she was in Cannes, France, enjoying the famous yearly film&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>A Los Angeles County Judge issued an arrest warrant for Lindsay Lohan for her failure to appear in court on May 20th. Lohan, who was scheduled to appear for her probation hearing for a 2007 driving under the Influence conviction, failed to show up. Instead she was in Cannes, France, enjoying the famous yearly film festival. Lohan claims her passport was stolen and therefore she was unable to get back to the U.S. But Beverly Hills Judge, Marsha Revel, had no sympathy for Lohan. Revel said Lohan should have skipped her France trip or made sure she was in the U.S. in time for her hearing. The Judge also commented that “actions speak louder than words” and that Lohan has “a history of not keeping scheduled appointments … I couldn’t have been more clear about the priority of this case and getting things done.” However, thanks to her representation Lohan was spared arrest when she landed in the U.S. Lohan’s $10,000 bond was posted and the arrest warrant was then recalled. See, <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/dui.html">Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a)</a>, (b), <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/warrants.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Warrants</a>, Probation Violations.<br><br><em>Criminal Law Updates by the Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo (714) 547-4636</em><br><br>Here is a CBS Early Show video discussing Lindsay Lohan’s case</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed aligncenter is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<iframe loading="lazy" title="Michael Lohan on Lindsay's Legal Troubles" width="500" height="375" src="https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/GNbksi3VEAc?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</div></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Dodger Tailgating]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dodger-tailgating/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/dodger-tailgating/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[arrest]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[capt-Bill-Murphy]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[fights]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[lapd]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[tailgating]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Baseball season has commenced and for Dodger fans it was a harsh opening day. In an effort to curtail violence and more minor disturbances the LAPD made their presence known during tailgating. Officials took a stricter approach after last year’s opening when someone was stabbed and several fights broke out. Capt Bill Murphy of the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="208" src="/static/2022/11/tailgate.jpg" alt="Dodger Tailgating" class="wp-image-1234"/></figure></div>


<p>Baseball season has commenced and for Dodger fans it was a harsh opening day. In an effort to curtail violence and more minor disturbances the LAPD made their presence known during tailgating. Officials took a stricter approach after last year’s opening when someone was stabbed and several fights broke out. Capt Bill Murphy of the LAPD explained to the Los Angeles Times that last year’s incident created much criticism toward the department and the baseball franchise for allowing such a disruptive atmosphere at a baseball game. Based on the article by the Los Angeles Times several fans were upset by the strict attitude of the police. Their view was that several tailgaters were drinking but were not hurting anyone and that more attention should be given to rowdy fans during the game. The number of arrests during tailgating was 132, with people cited for drinking in public and disorderly behavior. Both fans and police want a safe Dodger game experience they just differ on the means to achieve it. See <a href="http://www.bruzzolaw.com/criminal-charges/drunk-disorderly.htm" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Penal Code Sections 415, 647(f)</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen Receives Visit from Child Protective Services]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/charlie-sheen-receives-visit-from-child-protective-services/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/charlie-sheen-receives-visit-from-child-protective-services/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Charlie-Sheen]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[child-protective-services]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[cps]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dependency-proceedings]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[domestic-violence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[parenting]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sheens]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Sheen and his wife received a visit from Child Protective Services (CPS) at their home in Los Angeles. The reason for the home visit by authorities was a result of an alleged domestic violence incident which occurred near a ski resort in Colorado. After domestic violence incidents it is not uncommon for CPS to&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="320" height="246" src="/static/2022/12/alg_charlie-sheen_brooke-mueller.jpg" alt="Charlie Sheen and his wife" class="wp-image-1313" srcset="/static/2022/12/alg_charlie-sheen_brooke-mueller.jpg 320w, /static/2022/12/alg_charlie-sheen_brooke-mueller-300x231.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px" /><figcaption>Weiss for News</figcaption></figure></div>


<p>Charlie Sheen and his wife received a visit from Child Protective Services (CPS) at their home in Los Angeles. The reason for the home visit by authorities was a result of an alleged domestic violence incident which occurred near a ski resort in Colorado. After domestic violence incidents it is not uncommon for CPS to visit the home to insure the safety of the children who live there. The Sheens have two infant sons and Mr. Sheen has two other children from a previous relationship. After an official visit like this one CPS can decide to take no action or they may institute Dependency Proceedings, wherein the courts assess whether the parenting skills of the parents are sufficient for the children to remain in the home. In extreme cases the children can be removed from the parent and placed with a family member or in foster case. In the case of the Sheens it appears no action was taken by CPS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Medical Marijuana: Should Its Distribution Be Stopped?]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/medical-marijuana-should-its-distribution-be-stopped/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/medical-marijuana-should-its-distribution-be-stopped/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[american-safe-access]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[collectives]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[criminal-law]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[dispensaries]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[grow-marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[medical-marijuana]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[organica]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>According to The Orange County Register, the Los Angeles City Attorney is trying to legally force three dispensaries to stop selling marijuana for medical purposes. Specifically, the city prosecutor’s office is trying to get injunctions to force Organica and two Holistic Caregivers stores to stop all their over-the-counter sales. The City Attorney states that the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="301" src="/static/2022/12/mcbruzzo.jpg" alt="Medical Marijuana" class="wp-image-1316" srcset="/static/2022/12/mcbruzzo.jpg 300w, /static/2022/12/mcbruzzo-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></figure></div>


<p>According to The Orange County Register, the Los Angeles City Attorney is trying to legally force three dispensaries to stop selling marijuana for medical purposes. Specifically, the city prosecutor’s office is trying to get injunctions to force Organica and two Holistic Caregivers stores to stop all their over-the-counter sales. The City Attorney states that the law only authorizes “collectives” to grow marijuana and recover their costs, not to sell it.<br><br>Americans for Safe Access, an organization that supports medical marijuana, has repeatedly assisted these dispensaries in their legal battles against the City Attorney. Joe Elford, chief counsel for the organization stated that “the city attorney’s legal arguments are horribly flawed and have no basis in law.” He also accused the City Attorney and the District Attorney of taking action before the dispensaries even had time to comply with the city’s ordinance. Chief Deputy City Attorney, William Carter said that they are simply “enforcing the existing local and state laws as [they’ve] been doing for a long time” and therefore will not withdraw these lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Orange County Deputies bring Lawsuit to Stop Early Release of Inmates]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-deputies-bring-lawsuit-to-stop-early-release-of-inmates/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/orange-county-deputies-bring-lawsuit-to-stop-early-release-of-inmates/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[early-release]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Inmates]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Jails]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[kevin-peterson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[loren-mcmaster]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-california]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[orange-county-sheriff]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sacramento]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>The union representing around 1,800 deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department filed a lawsuit on February 16, 2010 to stop the early release of inmates from Orange County jails. This lawsuit, modeled after the one filed in Sacramento County, is the second one of its kind. In the Sacramento case, the judge issued a&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The union representing around 1,800 deputies with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department filed a lawsuit on February 16, 2010 to stop the early release of inmates from Orange County jails. This lawsuit, modeled after the one filed in Sacramento County, is the second one of its kind. In the Sacramento case, the judge issued a temporary restraining order halting the release of inmates under the new state law SB X3 18. Superior Court Judge Loren E. McMaster ruled that “the law was intended for state, not county inmates, and that the release of inmates into the streets while the number of deputies is being reduced is a ‘formula for disaster'” (Orange County Register). Attorneys representing the union argued that the state law, which went into effect January 25th, was meant to affect state prisons only, not county jails. Between January 25th and February 9th, 311 inmates have been released early from Orange County jails. Other counties, such as Los Angeles, are applying the law differently and in turn not releasing any inmates early. In the present suit, attorneys have also cited an inmate who was released early from Sacramento County jail on charges of assault with a deadly weapon who then went on to attempt to rape a woman just hours after his release. Kevin Peterson’s case is commonly referred to by law enforcement officials when stating opposition to this new law.<br></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Michael Jackson’s Doctor Charged with Involuntary Manslaughter]]></title>
                <link>https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/michael-jacksons-doctor-charged-with-involuntary-manslaughter/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.bruzzolaw.com/blog/michael-jacksons-doctor-charged-with-involuntary-manslaughter/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[california-penal-code]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[conrad-murray]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[involuntary-manslaughter]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[jackson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Los-Angeles]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[michael-jackson]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[propofol]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[sedatives]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Will-Bruzzo]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>After seven months of investigating, the Los Angeles County District Attorney has brought criminal charges against Michael Jackson’s physician, Dr. Conrad Murray. Murray, a cardiologist, has been charged with involuntary manslaughter (Penal Code Section 192) in connection with Jackson’s death on June 25, 2009. Dr. Murray is said to have acted “without due caution and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>After seven months of investigating, the Los Angeles County District Attorney has brought criminal charges against Michael Jackson’s physician, Dr. Conrad Murray. Murray, a cardiologist, has been charged with involuntary manslaughter (Penal Code Section 192) in connection with Jackson’s death on June 25, 2009.<br><br>Dr. Murray is said to have acted “without due caution and circumspection.” On the day of the tragedy, Murray tried to get Jackson to sleep using Valium and two other sedatives. However, Jackson remained awake for ten hours and demanded a stronger drug– Propofol. Finally, Murray gave in and gave Jackson Propofol. He left Jackson for two minutes to use the restroom, at which time he also talked on the phone for 45 minutes. When he returned, Jackson was not breathing. The cause of death was “acute propofol intoxication,” in conjunction with other sedatives.<br><br>Propfol, a drug most widely used by anesthesiologists to render surgical patients unconscious, is so dangerous that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration says only those trained in anesthesia should administer it. Murray now faces four years in prison for the non-intentional killing of Michael Jackson. Had this been more than negligence in administering a drug for an unapproved purpose, Murray could be facing charges of voluntary manslaughter or murder (California Penal Code Section 187).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>