Avvo badge
Top 100 Badge
Orange County Bar Association
Marines

How California’s New Retail Theft Crackdown Affects Prosecution in Orange County

Law Offices of William W. Bruzzo

California voters passed Proposition 36 in November 2024, significantly reshaping how retail theft is charged and prosecuted across the state. The changes reached Orange County courtrooms quickly, and prosecutors wasted no time applying them. If you are facing a theft charge in the area, you need to understand what the new law actually does before making any decisions about your case. We are ready to review your situation and explain how these new rules apply to your specific charge. The Law Offices of William Bruzzo has been handling retail theft defense in Orange County since these changes took effect.

What Did Proposition 36 Change About Retail Theft Prosecution?

Before Prop 36, Proposition 47 had set a $950 threshold for felony theft charges, which meant many retail theft arrests resulted in misdemeanors only. Prop 36 changed that for repeat offenders. A person with two or more prior theft or drug convictions can now be charged with a felony regardless of the dollar amount stolen. The measure also created a new provision targeting organized retail crime under PC 490.4, allowing prosecutors to pursue charges against multiple participants in coordinated theft operations. These are significant changes that affect how virtually every repeat theft case is handled in Orange County, and understanding them is the starting point for any defense strategy.

How Are Orange County Courts Applying These New Rules?

The Orange County DA’s office moved quickly to apply Prop 36’s enhanced charging provisions. Cases involving repeat offenders or multiple participants are now more likely to be filed as felonies, even when the merchandise value would not have triggered felony charges under the prior law. The Santa Ana courthouse, which handles the bulk of Orange County felony filings through our theft cases practice, has seen increased charging activity on retail theft matters. Judges and prosecutors are still working through how to apply some of the newer provisions, which create both risk and opportunity for defendants with capable legal representation.

What Defenses Still Apply Under the New Law?

Prop 36 did not eliminate defenses. Whether you are facing a misdemeanor or a felony, lack of intent remains a powerful argument. Prosecutors must still prove you intended to permanently deprive the store of the merchandise. First-time offenders with no prior record still have access to diversion programs in many Orange County courts. The value of items, the circumstances of the alleged taking, and whether you were actually part of any organized scheme all remain relevant. An experienced criminal defense attorney that Orange County residents rely on can evaluate whether the charging decision was appropriate and identify what options exist for your specific situation.

Charged Under Prop 36? An Orange County Defense Attorney Knows the New Law

Retail theft charges have become more serious under California’s new law, but that does not mean you are without options. If you have been charged with retail theft in Orange County, an experienced Orange County criminal defense attorney from our firm can review your case and identify your best path forward. The Law Offices of William Bruzzo is available now. Call (714) 547-4636 or contact us online for a free, no-pressure consultation available 24/7. El Abogado Habla Español.

Client Reviews

“I was pulled over for not having license plates on my car. The reason for that was because it was new. When the Officer pulled me over, he claims to have smelled marijuana and he began to ask me questions. I admitted to smoking marijuana earlier in the...

A.R.

“I was arrested and charged with Penal Code Section 273.5(a) [Domestic Violence with Traumatic Injury]. Unfortunately, some of my actions were caught on video. In addition, an infant was present during the incident. My family hired Attorney Will Bruzzo to...

E.C.

“I was charged with two counts of Vehicle Code 23109.1 [Engaging in a Speed Contest Causing Specified Injury] as a felony; two counts of Vehicle Code 23105(a) [Reckless Driving Causing Specified Injury], one count of Penal Code Section 368(b)(1) [Elder and...

P.D.

Get in Touch

Fill out the contact form or call us at (714) 547-4636 to schedule your free consultation.
  • phone.png Free Consultation
  • availabilty.png Available 24/7
  • x3C_Layer_x3E__copia.png Se Habla Español

Leave Us a Message